Scott Lively Ministries

“Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18). 

Every authentic Christian (and Torah-faithful Jew) knows that the rainbow belongs to God, not the “gays.” But how many realize that the hijacking of the rainbow by the LGBT movement is a leading sign of the immanency of the last days Antichrist kingdom? Cloaking itself in God’s rainbow represents far more than just arrogant disregard for God teachings in the Bible, it is living proof that Lucifer himself is the spiritual head of the triumphal “pride” celebrations taking place across the world.

Satan’s obsession from the beginning has been to take God’s throne for himself – and that is exactly what the “pride” movement represents. Indeed, the only glimpse the Bible gives us of what God’s throne in Heaven actually looks like is the Apostle John’s testimony in Revelation 4:3: “At once I was in the Spirit, and I saw a throne standing in heaven, with someone seated on it. The One seated there looked like jasper and carnelian, and a rainbow that gleamed like an emerald encircled the throne.”  

The rainbow signifies the presence and authority of God, which is why He chose that symbol to seal His covenant with mankind after Noah’s flood. In His own words He said: 

“I have set My rainbow in the clouds, and it will be a sign of the covenant between Me and the earth. Whenever I form clouds over the earth and the rainbow appears in the clouds, I will remember My covenant between Me and you and every living creature of every kind. Never again will the waters become a flood to destroy all life” (Genesis 9:13-15). 

What was the sin of Noah’s generation that finally triggered God’s wrath and unleashed the flood? The ancient Hebrew rabbis said it was humanity’s choice to “compose…nuptial songs in honour of pederasty and bestiality” i.e., to accept and celebrate homosexual “marriage” (Talmud, Genesis Rabbah 26:5:4).  

Importantly, God also warned that the next time humanity reaches that level of sin, He will sentence the people of the earth to destruction by fire. The incineration of Sodom and Gomorrah was a foretaste of that, as expressly stated in 2 Peter 2:6 “He condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to destruction, reducing them to ashes AS AN EXAMPLE of what is coming on the ungodly.” Jude 1:7 adds “In like manner, Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, who indulged in sexual immorality and pursued strange flesh, are on display AS AN EXAMPLE of those who sustain the punishment of eternal fire.” [Emphasis mine.]

Those verses are enough to prove that we are very close to triggering His wrath again, but there is more.  

The parallel prophecies of the “Beginning of Sorrows” in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24, Luke 21, and Mark 13) and the “Four Horsemen” of Revelation 6 warn us that the Antichrist will falsely portray himself as the Messiah at first. For example, the second coming of Yeshua the true Messiah is identified with the white horse of Revelation 19:11-16: 

“Then I saw heaven standing open, and there before me was a white horse. And its rider is called Faithful and True. With righteousness He judges and wages war. He has eyes like blazing fire, and many royal crowns on His head. He has a name written on Him that only He Himself knows. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and His name is The Word of God…[and] the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.”  

John also testified about the Antichrist in Revelation 6:2, saying: “So I looked and saw a white horse, and its rider held a bow. And he was given a crown, and he rode out to overcome and conquer.” In Revelation 13:7, John adds “ And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.” This is a prophecy of the now-emerging Antichrist kingdom. 

Take special note of the fact that God GIVES the Antichrist a crown (meaning the authority to conquer — as His instrument for testing and punishment of the world). But the Antichrist already HELD a BOW. The English word translated “bow” here is the same word used for “rainbow” in the original Hebrew, first used in Genesis 9, establishing a precedent for how it should be interpreted thereafter. Thus, the Antichrist already has possession and use of the rainbow BEORE he is unveiled as the Antichrist. Further cementing the Antichrist/rainbow correlation is Revelation 11:8 which states that Jerusalem under the Antichrist will mystically be called “Sodom and Egypt,” indicating in part that homosexuality and polytheism will largely define its culture.    

There is only one other place in Scripture where the rainbow is addressed: Ezekeiel 1:26-28: “Above the expanse…was the likeness of a throne…and on the throne high above was a figure like that of a man…and brilliant light surrounded Him…like that of a rainbow in a cloud on a rainy day. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD.” 

Of the Trinity, only Yeshua takes the form of a man, and He even called Himself “the son of man” in His earthly ministry. In the following chapters of Ezekiel He addressed the prophet by the same designation, “son of man,” and assigned him the role of a Watchman on the Wall with the duty to warn the wicked of the consequences of their rebellion (see especially Ezekiel 3:17-21). Failure to do so puts the blame for their death upon the Watchman.

Biblically speaking there is no greater form of national rebellion than the celebration of homosexuality, and, unfortunately, our society has perfected that rebellion in so-called “gay pride” parades. As Isaiah 3:9 summarizes: “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they parade their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.” That “reward” of God’s anger is not just for the “Sodomites” themselves but everyone who celebrates them (Romans 1:18-32), in contrast to the Bible’s example of “righteous” Lot who escaped God’s wrath because he was “vexed in his spirit” about their corrupt culture and conduct (2 Peter 2:7).

The rainbow is your warning sign. If you condone, let alone celebrate, “gay pride” you choose the side of Lucifer against God and earn for yourself a share of the wrath to come. Moreover, even if you consider yourself righteous in believing the Bible about LGBT sins, failure to meet your Watchman duty to warn the wicked of these truths puts their blood on your hands.  

From Genesis to Revelation the Bible shows that God does not mess around when it comes to this category of sin. Please remember that, and your duty to speak plain truth, whenever you see His rainbow being defiled.

###

For more, read Dr. Lively’s several books on this topic, including especially The Petros Prophecy and Redeeming the Rainbow which may be freely accessed and distributed.

The mass murder of children – in school classrooms and abortuaries. The deliberate genital mutilation of children to “change” their gender. The triumphal celebration of grotesque, disease-spreading sexual depravity as the ultimate “human right.” The needless injection of all the world’s people with dangerous experimental drugs by government and media coercion. The rise of a global religion in which men are their own gods to whom planet earth’s very equilibrium is subject and by whom all the laws of nature can be ignored or rewritten to suit their whims. The race to create “immortal” avatars for ourselves by blending humans with animals and machines.

If collective human sanity can be measured by its conscious rejection of the natural order of God’s Creation in favor of self-destructive alternatives, there has never been a time in human history – at least since the great flood – when the world has been as insane as it is right now.

Thus, never before has a mature biblical worldview, clearly expressed, been so essential to salvation of the lost. Paul states in 1 Corinthians 2:14-15 that “[t]he natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God. For they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual man judges all things, but he himself is not subject to anyone’s judgment.” Today, even the self-evident truths taught by the witness of the natural world are indiscernible to a generation steeped in humanist delusions.

Authentic Christians have an inherent super power for “pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God” (2 Corinthians 10:4-5). And we have a duty to wield that power offensively to rescue the Hell-bound, mind-enslaved captives lurching blindly all around us. They are being herded like sheep to slaughter, by legions of demons in human hosts, with faces like that of George Soros and Bill Gates and Nancy Pelosi and so many others whose evil deeds are known to us “by their fruit.” Many others are yet to be exposed.

Prophecy tells us that Satan will briefly conquer this world (Revelation 13:7), and our spiritual discernment shows us that conquest approaches rapidly. Even God’s “two witnesses” will ultimately be struck dead by Satan in God’s earthly capital, Jerusalem, when it has been fully reshaped by ubiquitous homosexuality and polytheism into the image of “Sodom and Egypt” (Revelation 11:7-8).

Is resistance therefore futile? Should we hide and wait for rescue? No, because our very purpose in this dark time is, like Christ and in His name, to “seek and save” the lost. We must run into, not away from the burning towers – the hostage-filled schoolhouses – the apostasy-preaching “churches” to snatch away as many as we can from Satan’s grasp (Jude 1:23).

We should always remember that nothing happens in God’s universe without His permission. He has a plan for His Creation, but built in to that plan is the right of free will in both men and angels. Being perfectly omniscient (all-seeing and all-knowing) God must have predestined everything according to His own will from the instant of His conception of the Creation. And yet, the free will of men and angels is shown to be a reality in Scripture, alongside just as many passages that prove the doctrine of predestination. It is the ultimate logical paradox of Christendom that is only partially reconciled by viewing predestination as the reality of timeless Heaven and free will as the reality of our time-bound universe.

Perhaps the best way to conceptualize His plan is to imagine Creation as God’s computer game in which the realities of time space and matter are fixed by laws, and where the characters live out a story centered on a pre-defined timeline that includes a series of key pre-set unchangeable events. But this game also includes a randomizing sub-program called “choice” that allows for the characters to deviate from the script to a limited extent, subject to an overarching failsafe mechanism that adjusts to human-created changes in the story to ensure that the key events occur as intended. The essential element of the “choice” program is “sin,” meaning error, that introduces chaos to the otherwise ordered system, triggering consequences that require a reordering of both the timeline and the script to achieve the next pre-set milestone in the story.

As characters in this story, every choice for sin that you and I make creates its own complications, which are compounded by the sins of others, in turn generating even more sin. Eventually, like 7.9 billion superballs that were intended to run in perfect parallel toward their mutual goal of Heaven, all are deflected by the power of sin into in a cosmic handball court where they instead constantly ricochet off each other and the walls of the enclosure in total chaos – each collision increasing the mathematical complexity of the solution beyond the capacity of any calculator but the mind of God. Yet He, despite that chaos, adjusts the characters and the storyline to fulfill His sequential goals which He has revealed to us in prophecies (Amos 3:7).

If someone in the original script was intended to complete a certain pre-set action but through sin fails to do it, God simply assigns someone else (Esther 4:14). If Christ’s followers had failed to shout His praises, God would have caused the very stones to cry out instead (Luke 19:40). Even though He allows rebellion, even to the point of forcing changes to significant aspects of His storyline – such as when the Israelites rejected the republic He designed for them in favor of a human monarchy (1 Samuel 8:1-22) – He cannot and will not be thwarted in His larger plan.

In God’s computer game some characters are “elect” with a special destiny even sin cannot defeat. If it were possible, even these elect could be deceived into following the last days Antichrist (Matthew 24:24) but it is NOT possible, because He “foreknew” and “predestined” these individuals per Romans 8:29-30. This is one of many proof-texts for predestination.

But other characters, like Judas, are “vessels created for destruction” per Romans 9:21-23. Still others decide their own fate by their choices (Matthew 10:23, Mark 4:16-17, John 15:5-6). God’s own choice is clear: He “is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). And yet many do perish. These last four citations are some of the many proof-texts for free will.

The bottom line is this: God is active in His Creation to bring about His plan. And WE are an essential part of that plan, “created for good works which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them” (Ephesians 2:10). The darker and more corrupt the world grows, the more essential is our role as light and salt. The more insane the worldly people grow, the more essential is our duty to cast down lies with truth, to help win them back to God.

Why June 3rd Memorializes the Ugly Consequences of “Gay Pride” Defied

It was morning in East Africa. The day was May 26th, 1886 and along the shore of Lake Victoria the mist still hung thickly in the jungle undergrowth, although the sun had risen well above the horizon. The night-time cacophony of wildlife had long since subsided and the land was quiet except for the buzzing of insects and the murmur of hushed voices.

In a wide clearing on a hill above the lake a dramatic scene unfolded. Uganda’s King Mwanga was holding court in the open-air gathering place in front of his temporary residence, his royal palace being under repair after a fire.

The occasion was the trial of Charles Lwanga, head of the royal page-boys and a convert from native pagan beliefs to Catholicism. Many of the young men under his care had become Catholics as well, while others had become Anglicans.

Lwanga’s crime was defiance of the King, whose authority over his subjects was total. The nature of his defiance was refusing to submit himself or his wards to homosexual sodomy by Mwanga, a violent pederast with voracious carnal appetites.

Lwanga knew he could expect no mercy from King Mwanga. In the preceding months the monarch had murdered five men for espousing Christian values, including the Anglican Bishop, James Hannington, and his own senior advisor Joseph Makasa (a recent Catholic convert) who criticized Mwanga for killing Hannington without giving him the traditional right to argue in his own defense. For that Makasa was beheaded. Three of Hannigton’s Anglican congregants were dismembered and their bodies burned.

However, it was not only Lwanga who would pay for denying King Mwanga his right to “gay” sex with the pages. Twenty five boys and young men would also share his fate, fifteen being his fellow Catholics, along with ten Anglicans.

With the rebels arrayed before him as a group, King Mwanga vented his white-hot rage, ordering the courageous souls to be bound with ropes, shackles, iron rings, and slave yokes and marched to the nearby city of Namugongo where they were held in those same torturous restraints for an entire week.

On June 3rd, not having yielded even under such abuse, they were murdered one-by-one, each being wrapped tightly in reed mats and thrown alive on a roaring fire.

The executioners were shocked when instead of begging for mercy or lamenting their cruel fate, the boys shouted encouragement to one another as they burned, like the martyrs of the ancient Roman amphitheaters.

To this very day, June 3rd is commemorated throughout Uganda as Martyr’s Day, recognized globally in both the Catholic and Anglican confessions.

Uganda is thus unique in all the world for celebrating the rejection of homosexual sodomy with its own annual holiday.

But it is a “holiday” that the pro-family movement around the world should embrace, as a reminder during “pride month” of what is really being celebrated under the stolen banner of God’s rainbow. “Gay Pride” is a culture of death, disease and brazen defiance of the One who created us male and female in His image, to bond together – one man and one woman — sealed by the covenant of true marriage.

#

Dr. Scott Lively has been a missionary to the global pro-family movement for more than thirty years, including three highly consequential missions to Uganda. This essay is adapted from his unfinished book on that topic as the first of a series of pro-family articles during “pride month” 2022 exposing the ugly true history of the LGBT movement. For more, information, go here: https://www.scottlively.net/subscribe/

One of the great controversies of the 20th Century regarded the legitimacy of the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion – which the Jewish Anti-Defamation League describes as “a classic in paranoid, racist literature. Taken by the gullible as the confidential minutes of a Jewish conclave convened in the last years of the nineteenth century, it has been heralded by anti-Semites as proof that Jews are plotting to take over the world.” I happen to agree with the ADL on this assessment, and would add that the Protocols is probably the world’s best example of “agitation propaganda” or “agitprop.”

Agitprop is designed to psychologically manipulate “the masses” to make them hate a person or group (e.g. “Jews,” “Trump” or “anti-vaxxers”). And indeed, the hate-inspiring Protocols has caused incalculable and continuing harm to Jews even to this day. As a longtime stalwart ally of Torah-faithful Jews and a strong defender of Israel, I have personally clashed many times with anti-Semites who cite the Protocols as a source of their hostility to Jews.

It is thus utterly shameful that the ADL has become a co-conspirator pushing the leading agitprop narrative of the 21st Century which falsely asserts that political conservatism equates to white supremacy, and that white supremacy is so pervasive and ingrained that it represents an existential threat to “democracy” and to Jews. It doesn’t seem to matter to them that the vast majority of white Christian conservatives are not only pro-Jew, but better friends to Israel than most American Jews (who remain, inexplicably, left-wing members of the anti-Torah, increasingly anti-Israel Democrat Party). The latest ADL contribution to “white supremacy” agitprop was recently showcased by the left-wing Associated Press: “ADL Says Buffalo Shooter Latest in A Long Line of White Supremacist Terrorists Who Embraced Racist, Antisemitic ‘Great Replacement Theory.’ ”

In reality, ADL’s legitimate alarm about Jewish replacement by anti-Semitic Arabs in Israel and Americans’ concern about replacement by millions of illegal aliens are both fact, not theory, but that’s not my focus here. What prompted me to write this article was reading a cherry-picked excerpt from the Buffalo Shooter’s 160-page manifesto in which he describes himself as a “white supremacist” and cites a few of the steps of his journey toward becoming a racially-motivated mass murderer. Those steps mentioned a group called 4-chan and other entities associated with the political right.

What immediately sprang to my mind was the similarity of these couple of paragraphs to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. It was like this kid was deliberately trying to frame the conservatives by pretending to be one, and intentionally hitting all the bullet-points of the progressives’ white supremacy narrative – just as the agitation-propagandists had done with the Protocols by pretending to speak on behalf of the Jews.

I’ve since learned that there is massive evidence from his social media history that the Buffalo Shooter is actually a lefty, which bolsters my first impression.

Obviously, a person would have to be crazy, or mind-controlled by really evil handlers – or both – to do something like this intentionally, but what better agitprop could one contrive than to sacrifice your own life and freedom for the cause of “social justice” by acting out a heinous crime that “proves” the white supremacist narrative. Is it really that much different, tactically, from the Antifa fascists who dressed like Tump supporters to infiltrate the Charlottesville gathering to create mayhem, or the Pelosi J6 goon squad that breached the Capital building and suckered some conservatives into following them inside, or the FBI orchestration of the Whitmer kidnaping?

My mention of “really evil handlers” evokes memories of Mel Gibson’s classic film “Conspiracy Theory” and the specter of fringe theories about MK-Ultra and such. Of course, “fringe” doesn’t necessarily mean false, but one doesn’t need to resort to those theories to explain how the Buffalo Shooter might have become the “Learned Elder” of white supremacy.

There are “evil handlers” engaging in mind control of young people – and adults – all over the America these days, from the Disney and public school “groomers,” to Covid fear-porn purveyors, to Russia-demonizing war-mongers, to cancel-culture “disinformation” Brownshirts, to the “sky is falling” global warming alarmists. They all share the same core ideology and tactical play-book. They are Marxists who specialize in agitprop. The Communists of the Soviet Union and the National Socialists of Nazi Germany were masters of it, as are their heirs, the ruling Cultural Marxists, aka “Progressives” of America’s purple uniparty today.

The crown jewel of their strategy is the “white supremacy” narrative. From the street-activists’ Ferguson riot-campaign kick-off and BLM follow-up, to academia’s Critical Race Theory curricula and programs, to the injection of racial “wokeness” into the commercial realm by predatory corporatists, to the massive investment of public resources by government and private funding by big business to “fight systemic racism,” to the media’s 1619 Project and subsequent public-consensus shaping efforts to equate “whiteness” itself with racism, ALL the constituencies of the Marxist left have become full-time agitation propagandists on the “white supremacy” theme.

And yet, they have almost no actual evidence to work with. because the overwhelming majority of conservatives are not racist, and those who are genuinely racist limit their racism to making nasty comments anonymously through fake names and avatars on social media. White supremacy as the left yearns for it to be is simply mythological.

Thus, the left’s “white supremacist” agitprop has to invent its own strawmen. They are reduced to writing and acting out their own scripts – sometimes literally – in all that ways I’ve listed above. There’s one last example I will leave you with, created by a “woke” film production company called Generation Hope https://www.youtube.com/c/GenerationHope/videos . Be aware these are actual social-justice training videos in active use in schools and workplaces. The one I really want you to see has been deleted from their site, but not before being copied, analyzed and mercilessly mocked HERE .

To be clear, I can’t say for sure the Buffalo Shooter is an Agent Provocateur who set out to deliberately and deviously frame conservatives to feed the white supremacy narrative, but I do know he’s a leftist, and today’s left is a virtual agitprop factory, running three shifts at full capacity. I’ll let you decide if his manifesto and the other examples cited herein can rightly be labeled The Protocols of the Looney Haters of Whiteness.

Even in their bold defiance of God, the radical left cannot help but affirm His truths about the roles of men and women in His Creation. When setting the stage for today’s emerging season of feminist rage, the evil Senator Chuck Schumer stood before the US Supreme Court and vowed “I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Schumer may be a moral reprobate, but he’s no girly-man. His threat was not just an example of raw, “toxic” masculinity, he was literally assuming a moral right to leadership of the feminist cause. He was the Black Knight on his mighty stallion of political power, spitting forth a scornful challenge before the King’s dias and throwing down his gauntlet, declaring himself to be the champion of the helpless damsels of darkness and pledging to defend their “honor” in mortal combat. And not a single feminist leader rebuked him for that, because they unconsciously recognize the natural order of male authority in gender relations. When Senator Pocahantas Warren recently tried to copy Schumer, it came across as merely shrill and impotent histrionics. She was laughed at by those she sought to intimidate.

How has the collective feminist world begun it’s “Summer of Rage” now that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, and the other three conservatives of the Supreme Court, have cast their preliminary vote to end federal protection for child-killing and return the matter to the states? Amusingly, they’re playing the victim in need of a rescuer: “Today is day one of an uprising to protect abortion rights,” said one of their main speakers at the first mass gathering of the troops. “It is day one of our feminist future and it is day one of a summer of rage where we will be ungovernable, ungovernable. And we will not stop until the politicians on our side start acting like they’re on our side.”

“Please, please save us, pro-choice men!” is their battle cry. And, of course, they – the toxically-masculine men of Antifa, eager to win the damsels’ favor (wink, wink) – have dutifully sprung into action to protect the women of their tribe by attacking their enemies.

Combat has already begun at the street level with at least two bombings of pro-life organizations: one in Madison, Wisconsin and one in Kaiser, Oregon. Importantly, these targets are right on Antifa’s home turf. Madison, WI and Eugene, OR (just south of Kaiser) are the birthplace of American “Antifism.” (I personally witnessed black-clad anarchists camped out at Eugene City Hall with “Kill the Police” signs back in the 1990s, and in that same decade was the speaker at a pro-family church event in Madison that was forcibly invaded and occupied by hundreds of proto-Antifan militants.)

Street brawling, bombings and rioting is not the domain of women. Yes, there are usually some women involved, mostly on the periphery, occasionally in the front lines as part of a cluster of men, but if you watch the videos of BLM/Antifa rioting in 2020, for example, what you see are men at war. And often the most forward-positioned “women” on the battlefield are not actually women but male transsexuals in female “form.”

Consider also the difference in the male-dominated Antifa, and the female-controlled Black Lives Matter (founded by two Marxist lesbians). Antifa has used its money for the mission of burning down cities and defeating the police. If you were to review their “books” you’d undoubtedly see most entries are for gasoline, pallets of bricks, tactical gear, logistics and travel expenses, and all the other supplies and services related to urban warfare. How have the women of BLM spent their money? They’ve bought luxurious and beautifully decorated homes, to “ Creat[e] space for black imagination and innovation and centering black joy,” which one investigator characterized as “[J]ust a fancy way to say, ‘We bought mansions for parties.”

After more than a century of effort and countless billions of dollars spent to erase distinctions between men and women, even the most “woke” zombies of the left cannot suppress their true nature. Their men remain mission-oriented, and their women remain focused on “the nest.”

Ironically, even the mission of creating a “feminist movement” was the work of a man, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, according to feminist pioneer Clara Zetkin. “Comrade Lenin frequently spoke to me about the women’s question. Social equality for women was, of course, a principle needing no discussion for communists. It was in Lenin’s large study in the Kremlin in the autumn of 1920 that we had our first long conversation on the subject. ‘We must create a powerful international women’s movement, on a clear theoretical basis’, Lenin began…‘Up to the present, however, [we] haven’t got very far. You will have to help.” Clara dutifully complied.

Radical feminism is a Marxist invention intended to accomplish what Cultural Marxism pioneer Herbert Marcuse prescribed as the essential prerequisite for defeating Judeo-Christian civilization: “a disintegration of…the monogamic and patriarchal family.” Patriarchal means the natural order of male authority as seen in human civilization from its dawn. Feminism was specifically designed by the Communists to disrupt that order and sow social chaos.

Ironically, that mission-oriented man, Marcuse, gave today’s “ungovernable women” their marching orders. His lifelong advocacy of “the Great Refusal” (ie. civil disobedience and cultural warfare) as a strategy for breaking down the existing social order to make way for a Marxist utopian alternative was articulated in his books Eros and Civilization (1955) and One-Dimensional Man (1964), and was adopted by the Stonewall-era “gay” leaders in the 1960s (and their political heirs) who have been the driving force of “progressivism” ever since.

Gender reality is a self-evident truth. Left to themselves all rational people recognize binary heterosexuality and the natural family as normal, healthy and eminently sustainable. It takes persistent aggressive training to convince people that killing their babies and switching genders is good and not bad for individuals and society. That’s why the enemy focuses on the children.

How can we stop the insanity? Real men need to “man up” and make it their mission to take power back from the radical feminists and their Black Knights. Real women need to band together and reclaim ownership of the “women’s voice,” and use that voice to help and encourage their men, and to shame the “damsels of darkness” into repentance.

The same corrupt elites who orchestrated both the 2014 anti-Russian coup in Ukraine and the 2020 anti-American coup to remove President Trump are now focused on regime change in Russia itself. The key to their plan is demonizing Vladimir Putin as the new Hitler. Our whole country seems to have been swept up in the smear campaign, but we Americans, especially we conservatives, should not be so quick to surrender our right to informed consent when the potential for a nuclear WWIII is on the line.

I am writing this article in my four capacities as 1) an attorney, 2) a pastor 3) a missionary with extensive relevant experience in Russia and the former Soviet Union, and 4) a serial victim of serious media character assassination.

As an attorney, I am reminding everyone that one of the fundamental bedrock principles of American jurisprudence is A) innocence until proven guilty B) by a court of competent jurisdiction C) after a careful review of ALL the relevant evidence, D) as presented, explained and defended by competent legal counsel, E) in a balanced, rules-based adversarial contest designed to ensure that the truth of the matters at issue will prevail. This is America’s gold standard of fairness: the best in all the world since the dawn of civilization, which has set us apart from, for example, third-world dictatorships which convict people without trial in the court of public opinion with no counter-evidence allowed because it’s banned as “disinformation.”

As a pastor I am reminding Christians that believers in the God of the Bible have an affirmative duty to seek and speak objective truth in all things, and that the sin of “bearing false witness” is such a serious crime in God’s eyes, that the punishment for the offender is to receive the same punishment that the falsely accused victim would have received. Repeating false claims about someone to their harm without due diligence on your part makes you an accessory to the crime.

As a missionary with extensive relevant experience in Russia and the former Soviet Union, I can testify from first-hand observation that today’s Russia is not only NOT a Communist country, but is (point for point) arguably more Christian in its culture and policies than the now Marxist-controlled United States – a fact I am ashamed and distressed as a patriot who loves my country to have to admit. I have never personally met or interacted with President Putin, so my opinion of him is based on publicly available sources, such as his speeches and media interviews. However, I have assessed the mentality and character of the Russian people in hundreds of interactions spanning all levels of their society and believe them to be the closest to American conservatives of all the peoples of the world that I have encountered in my missionary and personal travels through 66 countries. And they – the Russian people – are overwhelmingly pro-Putin. He is to his people the equivalent of Donald Trump, but with a much higher percentage of the population behind him (although every day that Biden remains in office, Trump’s support rises).

As a serial victim of serious media character assassination, still prominently listed on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate” list, and still smarting from a major federal lawsuit accusing me of “crimes against humanity” for preaching in Africa against the LGBT agenda (a case I finally won after 6 ½ years of judicial and media abuse) I have a rare and highly developed insight into how character assassination really works in the modern world.

I know first-hand just how devious and sophisticated are the tactics used by the elites to demonize people targeted for personal destruction. An oversimplified summary can be glimpsed in Saul Alinsky’s three part Marxist strategy of targeting a person (you) to be the symbol of their opposition, freezing you in place through control of pubic opinion about you, and then destroying you as painfully and publicly as possible to try and make you as “untouchable” as Hitler with leprosy.

The only possibility of escape from the Saul Alinsky trap is to present counter-evidence to the smear narrative, which is IM-possible if that evidence is censored as “disinformation” by the government and media-moguls. I successfully broke free from the trap by doing something too interesting to the public for my enemies in government and the media to suppress: I ran for governor of Massachusetts and showed my true self to the people during that campaign. But Putin literally has no defender of significance in the US to counter-act the character assassination – and so, for all the reasons listed above, I am making this humble effort.

To be absolutely clear, I don’t know if Vladimir Putin is guilty of any of the specific acts of which he has been accused over the years. I personally don’t trust the accusers in the Biden/Obama Defense, State or Intelligence agencies and the media and neither should any American conservatives, because we’ve all been smeared by the same people for years. That doesn’t mean Putin is innocent, but it does mean that we should all recognize our personal investment in ensuring he gets a fair evidence-based hearing and that we shouldn’t just join the media-inflamed lynch mob against him. I hope we can all agree that edited and spun TV news reporting is NOT trustworthy evidence. (Can I get an Amen from the pro-lifers, 2nd Amendment and Trump supporters here?)

It’s not just that we have a duty to seek and speak truth, and a huge investment in preserving the principle of “innocent until proven guilty,” but we ought to be wondering WHY they’re suppressing open discussion on Putin and Russia so aggressively and HOW we might benefit by knowing whatever truths the media may be hiding from us.

I do know that the first rule of character assassination of a public figure is to never allow the public to compare the target with other public figures as a measure of their merit, but only to compare them to a hypothetical perfect alternative. We saw this in the gross mistreatment of President Trump when every one of his flaws, real and imagined, were spotlighted and magnified while similar or comparable flaws in every other politician were simply ignored or whitewashed.

If we’re going to try Putin in the court of public opinion, the least we can do is compare him point for point not with the perfect standard of Jesus Christ, but with other current and recent world leaders. How does Putin compare, for example to Joe Biden? Justin Trudeau? Boris Johnson? Emmanuel Macron? George Bush? Bill Clinton? Angela Merkle? Barack Obama? Have any of them killed foreign enemies? Conducted military operations on foreign soil that harmed civilians? Sabotaged political rivals? Consorted with billionaire “oligarchs?” Making fair comparisons is a duty we owe to ourselves, as much as to those being smeared.

I’ve done my due diligence and, on balance, believe Putin is a relatively a good leader of his people – far better than Biden – and certainly not a Hitler. Again, I’m not saying Putin isn’t a flawed man. I’m saying the accusations against him should be tested in a fair hearing. None of us should unthinkingly parrot war propaganda from people we have good reason not to trust. We should instead demand that our golden standards of discerning truth are applied to these questions. Wouldn’t you demand the same for yourself if you were the target?

It’s really no secret that the US Supreme Court has for decades been the global elite’s ace in the hole for controlling American policy. SCOTUS is rarely the body where our policies have been conceived and birthed but instead where those policies most threatening to the elites agenda have been aborted. The key to control of that nine-member, ideologically polarized club has been the “swing” voter on the court who serves as the “abortionist of last resort” for killing any policy that could slow or potentially derail the train to global Marxism.

Ironically, I was rudely awakened to this reality in the Stenberg v. Carhart (2000) partial birth child-killing case when swing-voter Sandra Day O’Connor was the decider. I was literally in the courtroom to watch the oral argument on that case when, from her own lips, I heard her describe partial birth child-killing as a “gruesome procedure.” I left DC that day believing we had won the case because the one person with the power to stop child-murder in the delivery process knew just how evil it really is. But then, shockingly, she sided with the liberals to ensure that gruesome procedure would continue unhindered.

I now believe that O’Connor was not truly the decider in Carhart – she was an agent of dark powers behind the court and her vote to protect the abortion industry was a part of the price she had to pay for her seat at the head table of the elites.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who had joined O’Connor’s Roe v. Wade-affirming plurality opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, was the swing voter who notoriously wrote the majority opinion in all four of the SCOTUS opinions establishing “gay” cultural supremacy over Christianity.

Importantly, Chief Justice John Roberts became the key swing voter on several ideologically-polarizing cases – until President Trump’s appointment of Amy Coney Barrett created a 6/3 conservative/liberal split.

This change in the balance has robbed Roberts of power, a fact that is prominently showcased in the growing scandal over the unprecedented leak of the draft opinion of the Dobbs v Jackson case that will finally overturn Roe v Wade unless the left can intimidate one of the conservatives into changing their vote. Roberts is simply impotent to protect Roe v Wade without cheating, and the whole world can see it.

For that reason my immediate gut-reaction guess as to who the leaker might be was Roberts himself. On reconsideration, that seems improbable. But in working through the arguments and counter-arguments in my mind, it struck me that the main reason that possibility is implausible is that Roberts is best known for his supposed protectiveness of the court’s reputation for political neutrality. That priority is supposedly what motivated Roberts to prevent all of the Trump-related election-fraud lawsuits from getting a hearing on the merits.

If Roberts truly is a zealot in the cause of the court’s political neutrality, the single best action he could take to prevent a recurrence of this appalling breach of security, is to deliberately and openly add his vote to the pro-life side of the case as a form of “sanction” against the anti-life radicals now waging a pressure campaign against the conservatives.

Now, as a practical matter, sanctions are punishments related to the conduct of the PARTIES to a case, not to individuals or groups in the larger society. In this case, however, as the votes stand, Robert’s vote would be irrelevant to the outcome, and he could argue that the parties are unaffected by his strategic use of it as a deterrent to outside meddling with the court’s process.

Of course, it is conceivable (but highly unlikely in my opinion) that the radicals could force a conservative justice to change their vote, making Robert’s vote the deciding one. That would be a just outcome in that circumstance, even if problematic regarding the rights of the parties.

It would be problematic because, technically, there are many reasons a justice might change their vote in the normal course of business, and there’s no way to prove the vote was changed by coercion. No justice would ever admit to changing their vote out of fear.

But practically speaking the public would never believe a changed vote in THIS case was due to anything but political pressure. And THAT perception of “victory through coercion” would virtually ensure that the “leak and threaten” tactic would be used again. Strike that. It would CERTAINLY ensure that the “leak and threaten” tactic would be used again.

Importantly, the Supreme Court accepts review of cases based not upon their concern for the particular parties but based upon the importance to the nation of the issues at stake and how the law should be applied to those issues to reach the most beneficial conclusion consistent with the legislative intent of the lawmakers. There is thus an implicit duty upon the court to weigh factors outside the four corners of the documents.

My conclusion in working through this analysis is that Justice Roberts can and should, legally and ethically cast his vote in this case as a strategic judicial statement against the attempted politicization of the court, akin to sanctioning one party for bad conduct by favoring the other party, but in reality sanctioning the social ATTITUDE of contempt for the dignity and authority of the court.

Update: I published a draft of this article (ending with the above paragraph) on Sunday morning on my own blog, intending to refine and submit it to WND on Monday. But by Sunday afternoon, Fox News was reporting that “Roberts is still attempting to persuade Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh to take a more incremental approach” (i.e. change their vote).

Then this morning a supporter sent me a link to former military intelligence officer Jeffrey Prather’s “pattern analysis” of how the leak and pre-coordinated media and street activism unfolded — essentially an outline of persuasive circumstantial evidence that the leaker was in fact Roberts, through surrogates. (The first ten minutes includes his summary). I now think my “hunch” about Roberts may have been a Word from the Lord.

My article still stands as an easy, workable solution to the SCOTUS crisis that could save the court from the worst scandal of its history, and perhaps even set the nation back on a healthy trajectory. But I now recognize it as probably just a pipe dream since Roberts appears to lack the character to defy Obama — or whatever other principality he serves in the cause of child-killing.

“The groomer doth protest too much, methinks!”
Queen Gertrude, in Hamlet, by William Shakespeare (paraphrased).

One of the first things I learned as a newly minted pro-family activist in the late 1980s was that the closer one hits the mark in stating truths unfavorable to the LGBT cause, the more vocal and violent is their outrage. I noticed it first regarding public comments pointing out the obvious, factual association of AIDS with sodomy: extreme, rend-your-garments level over-reaction. I observed it again in response to my book The Pink Swastika thoroughly documenting the homosexual roots of the Nazi Party. The fury that unleashed was like kicking a hornets nest. But the most violent LGBT reactions have always been triggered by exposing their homosexual recruitment of children. The whole world has watched the left’s immediate full-throated all-hands-on-deck counter-attack in support of Disney and public school grooming policies after Governor DeSantis exposed them.

So, Precept #1 is this: Regarding facts which threaten the LGBT agenda, the more consequential the truth being told, the more anguished the LGBT screams.

Unfortunately, Precept #2 is this: That tactic actually works by triggering a primal “rescue the victim” impulse in fellow humans. This is the reason that women (the softer hearted sex) in general, and liberal women (and girly men) in particular are the most susceptible to LGBT propaganda, and frankly to all appeals to “victim-hood” (except the actual victim-hood of unborn babies which is suppressed at all costs behind obscurantist euphemisms). If a group can plausibly define themselves as a victim-class, the liberals will support them even to the point of excusing rioting and murder against their “oppressors” (e.g. Black Lives Matter). It’s not rational, but it’s a real thing, and it is central to Marxist strategy.

Have you seen ANY public discussion on the still sky-high correlation of AIDS and receptive anal intercourse since the 1980s? Have you seen ANY public debate on the heavily documented homosexual roots of the Nazi Party EVER? Have you seen the media admit the existence of an LGBT “agenda” EVER? The proof is in the pudding. LGBT tantrums have worked spectacularly to suppress truths they don’t want discussed.

“We’re the victims, here!” wail the teachers and administrators whose elementary school grooming tactics and agenda are now being systematically exposed to a nation of shocked and angry parents. Even more insidiously, these groomers and their powerful network of defenders are adding “These children are victims! – of systemic societal and parental ignorance and bigotry.”

These upside-down arguments are literally Diabolical – a tactic of Diablo, the Devil, who always calls good evil and evil good. These children ARE victims, but victims of the sexual deviants our society has allowed to infiltrate and commandeer every major social institution we have.

Let’s talk about how grooming works as a practical matter. Grooming is roughly synonymous with recruiting. We don’t use the word “recruiting” related to the homosexual movement, because of LGBT tantrums in the 1980s and 90s. It’s a forbidden term. But’s it’s a more accurate term. Grooming is associated almost exclusively with pedophilia, but even in the LGBT community, pedophiles are a minority. Proportionally the percentage of pedophiles is much higher among LGBTs than in the larger society, especially among homosexual men. Pederasy, or sex between adult men and pubescent boys, is a sub-category of pedophilia and has been the core of male homosexual culture going back even before the Greeks of Plato’s time. It was a defining characteristic of the early Nazi Brownshirts, and is the common denominator in the few homosexual crimes that still make the news these days. Harvey Milk, Jim Jones (of Jonestown), Obama bundler (and Human Rights Campaign founder) Terry Bean, Portland Mayor Sam Adams, Seattle Mayor Ed Murphy, Kevin Spacey, recently convicted Ed Buck, Obama “Safe Schools Czar” and GLSEN founder Kevin Jennings, and most of the founders of the American LGBT movement going all the way back to the 1920s are proven or plausibly accused pederasts.

And yet, homosexual pedophiles are definitely NOT the majority of LGBTs, especially when you include lesbians, whose sexual attraction to minors is much less common than among men, in my observation.

Focusing only on the pedophile aspect of recruiting blinds us to the bigger and more dangerous phenomenon. The LGBT pedophile is focused only on satisfying their own perverse sexual cravings which are, of course, terrible crimes that must be prevented if possible, and harshly punished if not. But it is limited to just those children they get their hands on through grooming. The much larger agenda of the long-term LGBT vision is to recruit ALL the children into the ideology of sexual anarchy in which there are no boundaries to sexual conduct, and in which homosexual experimentation with EACH OTHER is the means to determine one’s own “sexual identity.” And given that one’s first sexual climax is the human psychological equivalent to “imprinting” among birds, the percentage of children who then decide they are “gay” grows (and has grown) exponentially.

What the LGBT movement wants, and has largely achieved, is total cultural and political hegemony. The “sexual revolution” has been their vehicle, which they, not their heterosexual co-conspirators, have been driving all along. And the final phase of that century-long plan is the wholesale recruitment of our children and grandchildren into their movement as the final victim class, fighting the “oppressive” older generations to win their right to sexual self-determination, meaning the right to indulge in any fantasy in the realm of sexual anarchy, and to punish those who get in their way. Got that, “Boomer?”

We started losing this war back in the 1980s when we accepted the false premise that “discrimination” against sexual perversion is “morally wrong.” That flipped logic on its head and essentially criminalized Biblical values on sex and family. If you legally can’t discriminate against something, you make it impossible to stop. The LGBT stranglehold on the teachers unions (and every other arm of leftism) is living proof. The inertia of “traditional values” ensured that resistance to their agenda would continue on a steadily declining scale as propagandized youth replaced traditionalist elders, but now the left believes it is so close to making our dissent irrelevant, they’ve dropped their pretense and broken out in a mad dash for the finish line.

HOWEVER, the good news in this analysis is that Trump and the MAGA movement have proved that we still have a sizable traditionalist majority, no matter what the lying media wants us to believe. And ironically, that majority is actually growing larger with every illegal alien the Democrats lure across the border. (They may be invaders, but they’re mostly pro-family invaders. God has a sense of humor.)

Our new anti-grooming battlefront is starting to drain the LGBT swamp like I never thought would happen. Parents are taking back school boards and big corporations are rethinking their “wokeness” as Disney stock is plummeting. The entire left is screeching like banshees that “grooming” is a lie, proving that we’re precisely on target.

It is time to remember Precept #3: Half-Measures Can Not Defeat an Implacable Foe. This culture-war is a zero-sum game. It’s like the fight against cancer in your body. You won’t truly be well until the cancer is purged. The cancer is the agenda, not the people. The people are salvageable. The LGBT ideology, on the other hand, is demonic and thus irredeemable.

As this liberation campaign picks up steam, let’s determine to take back ALL the ground and fully restore God’s standards on sex and family that blessed our nation for so many generations. THAT, more than any other factor, would truly make America great again. And let’s not stop this time, just because they scream.

I was once a useful idiot but intense persecution by the LGBTs cured me of my fear of bucking propaganda narratives and let me see behind the curtain of the elites. There is no shame in being a “useful idiot” on an issue unless you remain one after learning the truth.

How do the agents of tyranny win in a democratic society? They convince a majority of the voters to voluntarily choose the path to slavery (and ensure that enough dead people vote to guarantee a “majority” whenever it’s close). The process always requires substantial control of public information by the tyrants to steer public opinion, and usually involves, as a motivator, either a great existential social crisis or a war against great evil. We Americans have been subjected to both motivators, back to back. The tyrants started with the Plandemic as cover for an unprecedented election fraud campaign to wrest the White House away from President Trump (and roll back his accomplishments), and then they shifted smoothly from Covid to Ukraine.

In that process, the percentage of “useful idiots” in the population – meaning those who accept the propaganda narrative and side with the tyrants against their own interests – grew exponentially. Many of the same people who opposed the tyrants on Covid tyranny let themselves be suckered into joining these same puppet-masters against a new threat: Vladimir Putin and the Russians.

“This is different,” the newly captivated crowd reasons, “because we already agree that Putin and Russia represent great evil.” They don’t remember that the elites’ one-sided anti-Russian narrative long-predates the Plandemic, going back to the start of Cold War II in 2013. That’s what makes useful idiots easy to dupe – they lack historical perspective and tend to follow the path of social trends, even when they nominally oppose those trends. This is why the “conservative” movement has always moved continually leftward about three steps behind the “progressives:” a phenomenon exemplified by present attitudes favoring the “progressive” social priority of “gay marriage,” even by many who still (for now) vigorously fight “transgenderism.”

Only a useful idiot would fail to see that “gay marriage” and “transgenderism” are the exact SAME AGENDA wearing different clothes. Only a useful idiot would fail to question anti-Russian war propaganda when there has been ZERO public debate on its veracity combined with unprecedented censorship of dissenting voices – far beyond what they did with Covid and election fraud. And when the strongest evidence steering public opinion on Russia and Ukraine comes from the enemy-of-the-people TV networks – the top global masters of manipulation! As an antidote I suggest this article which I have dubbed “The Ivermectin of Analyses on Ukraine” and its sequel .

What defines a “useful idiot?” It’s more than simply working against your own interests, it is working FOR the elites in the pursuit of THEIR agenda. And what, ultimately, is their agenda? It us the enslavement of mankind: the Satanic agenda first seen under Nimrod and active in the world ever since. Another category of useful idiots may be triggered by this – those who reject or compromise Biblical truth in favor of the materialist counterfeit worldview of the elites. The first tenet of Marxism has always been Atheism, enforced by mockery.

Embarrassment among some Christians about spiritual truths like the existence and work of Satan is a poisonous fruit of that mockery. Worse, many self-declared “non-religious” people are simply cowards who choose “agnosticism” to avoid ridicule. Both groups serve the elites agenda through passivity.

What is the opposite of the elites’ agenda? It is self-determination under God. God’s agenda for us is ordered liberty within the parameters of His just laws. His example was the Israelite Republic under Joshua and the Judges, which America’s Founders recreated in a modern form.

Self-determination is the very heart of the battle for liberty we now face. Self determination is the right and power to choose what we inject into our bodies or wear on our face. It is the right and power to choose our own government through a secure and honest election process. It is the right and power to decide whether to break away from a government we no longer trust or control and establish our own new government. That’s how we became a nation, triggering our War of Independence against the British. And that is how the Russian-speaking people of the Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk exercised their own self-determination, triggering their current war (backed by Russia) against the British and Americans (NATO). Vladimir Putin explained the Russian perspective on that this week in his joint press conference with the Secretary General of the UN. Here is the transcript that our own corrupt government doesn’t want you to read.

Ironically and cynically, our “progressive” opponents in the culture war – the ones most thoroughly indoctrinated in the elites narratives and most dedicated to its goals – exploit the CONCEPT of self-determination and appeal to it in the battle for “transgender rights.” The core of their argument to the public is that even (especially!) children have the right to self-determination to choose their “sexual orientation and gender identity.” But it’s only a one-way street, because these same groomers violently insist that once children have self-declared as homosexuals and transgenders, they have NO right of self-determination to recant and reorient to a normal binary, heterosexual identity. Even while these sick perverts are manipulating vulnerable kindergartners into “coming out” as “gay” or “tranny” – in captive-audience pressure sessions that would put time-share salesmen to shame – their LGBT movement is working aggressively to ban “conversion therapy” worldwide.

And likewise, the Biden/Bush/Clinton/Obama/Soros Empire of Lies driving us headlong into WWIII exploits the concept of self-determination in framing their globalist agenda as a “fight to preserve democracy.” Ha! If our founders knew that “democracy” would come to be defined by abortion, sodomy, genital mutilation, anti-white racism, censorship of unapproved viewpoints, economic slavery to a corporatist oligarchy, dissolution of our national boundaries, science-denying medical tyranny, and the destruction of the natural family they would have laid down their guns at Lexington and stuck with British common law.

Truth be told, America was never intended to be a Democracy but a Republic which features a democratic process for electing representatives with limited delegated powers, subject to the people. But our Republic was stolen from us in the coup of 2020, by the same people who staged the Ukraine coup in 2014, setting the Russia/Ukraine war in motion.

By the grace of God we MAY start to claw back our Republic in 2022: “MAY” because nothing is guaranteed when fighting people who are willing to start WWIII to kill our momentum (and perhaps even stage a false flag to lock us down again under martial law as the election nears).

But as of now, thanks to the elites’ skillfulness in deceit and manipulation, we have a Democracy of Useful Idiots.

###

I had already written and submitted the above article to WND when I found the above video linked from Revolver News. As you may know, I am text oriented and don’t watch many videos, but I watched the entire hour of Col Black’s testimony with rapt attention. I’ve ever encountered such candor and authentic patriotism in my life. This man’s knowledge, wisdom and bravery in speaking these dangerous truths at this moment of burgeoning fascism under the Biden/Obama regime is truly inspirational. I strongly urge you to watch this before it is removed by the censors.

Speculation is rife that the elites are about to dump Joe Biden, given that the corporate media has begun to turn against him and the deep state is allowing the Hunter Biden laptop to go fully public. Some have gone further and speculated that they intend to put Barack Obama back into the White House. I have been a card-carrying member of the latter group for a very long time.

I could be wrong but to my knowledge I was the first to suggest that a reinterpretation of the 22nd Amendment could be the vehicle for Obama’s return to the presidency. On August 20, 2021, I outlined a scenario by which “Obama [would] be called out of retirement and retake the world stage…returning [him] to the White House by whatever sequence of resignation, appointments and resignations would best work to retire Biden, minimize a Harris presidency, and place Obama back on the throne. All accompanied by a unified chorus of legal experts and media pundits spinning a new interpretation of the 22nd Amendment regarding presidential term limits (e.g. it only limits “two elections” after all – not an appointment to VP by Harris, followed by her resignation and reappointment to VP by Obama). That battle would most certainly go to the Supreme Court, where, conveniently, Obama’s main man John Roberts (the guy who killed all the pro-Trump election fraud lawsuits) is still Chief Justice.”

In my WND column of October 25th, 2021 I went further and predicted a scenario through which Biden could be removed with the least damage to the Democrat party, writing “I’ve long predicted that Joe will be the scapegoat for whatever goes wrong. Obama himself pretty much telegraphed Biden’s usefulness as a scapegoat. As quoted in Politico during the primary, ‘One Democrat who spoke to Obama recalled the former president warning, ‘Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up.’ I hypothesized during the Afghanistan debacle that the elites might stage a Biden stroke during a staged hostage crisis (a la Benghazi) as part of an Obama return-to-power strategy. [but] today I think the most likely [is a] ‘Great Reset’ scenario [featuring a] 2021/22 winter collapse followed by a spring recovery that features Biden’s removal.

“Anyone but Joey the Scapegoat would suffer severe consequences for screwing things up so colossally – even for what he has already done, let alone what comes next – but as I said in my Afghan hypothesis: ‘My guess is that the Hollywood scriptwriter helping Barack Obama design his return-to-power strategy wants to give Joe – ever the faithful Waterboy for the Uniparty – a tragic exit designed to maximize public sympathy for him now and in the history books. … [Plus] whatever consequences and culpability there might be for the election fraud emerging from the shower of evidence that’s about to begin, could be deflected to Biden as well, along with the mantra ‘but hey, hasn’t the poor guy suffered enough?'”

Today I’d like to both update my predictions and bring them within the scope of biblical prophecy.

First, I want to reiterate that I don’t expect Biden to face a “hostile takeover” or removal through use of the 25th Amendment against his will. I still think its more likely they’ll stage a stroke or similar sympathy-stirring health crisis that prompts him to resign “for the good of the nation.” The elites will use the situation to put all the blame for everything on the guy who can’t really be blamed because he’s not mentally competent, and who “nobly and sacrificially stepped aside to make way for the only person truly capable of fixing these problems: President Barack Obama.”

I think my oft-repeated prediction of a winter 2021/22 “great collapse” to justify the “great reset” has partially come to pass, but I may have been wrong about a spring recovery because the pain and suffering still seems too minimal to drive people to their knees in surrender to the elites. We’re suffering a serious decline, but not yet a real collapse.

I had also suggested in the past that war could be the catalyst for collapse, but hadn’t specifically predicted the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Vladimir Putin has publicly set May 9th as the end date of his “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine – to emphasize the anti-Nazi theme he has used to justify it (May 9th being the date of Russia’s final victory over Nazi Germany in WWII). IF Russia is able to pull that off, and IF the globalists don’t force us into WWIII in the interim, we might still see a US version of the “great reset” before summer. But we know they really want this war because they really want, and need, a great collapse.

For all those reasons I’m now leaning more toward a fall “reset,” a conclusion strongly bolstered by two additional reasons: politics and prophecy.

Politically speaking, the timeline of the great collapse and reset has always been dictated by the US election cycle, specifically 2022 and 24. The globalists can’t under any circumstances allow Trump to be re-elected. But the 2022 primary season is far less important than the November elections, and thus the game-changing impact of the great reset – a one-time event – would seem to be more useful in the fall.

Prophetically speaking, this is the seventh and final year of the current Shemita cycle (2016-2022). The next one begins on the Feast of Trumpets, which runs from the evening of September 25th through the 27th . If, as many believe, we are now in the period of time Jesus described in Matthew 24 as “the beginning of sorrows” this coming seven year Shemita cycle could very well be the period of the “seven year peace treaty” that many believe is prophesied in Daniel 11. Given how close we seem to the outbreak of WWIII, the possible need for such a treaty appears more and more plausible.

And given that the start of this seven year “peace” period begins the countdown to the unveiling of the Antichrist (the first 3 ½ years of which he rules as a seemingly benign power), the return of Obama to the US presidency in that context would seem especially significant. I personally have never scratched Obama from the top of my list of candidates for the Antichrist, and included him as a candidate in the introduction to my book-in-progress Dynasty of Darkness.

Finally, if we really are on the cusp of that momentous seven years, and if the “pre-trib rapture” is true, look for it on this coming Feast of Trumpets. However, my view differs on the timing of that.

###

For my perspective on the rapture read The Prodigal Son Prophecy on this website.