Click here to access the full series of articles and videos on this theme.

Was the Protestant Revolution a Judeo-Christian Joint Venture?

In the 17th Century, at one of the high points of the Hebraic Movement in Christian Holland and Great Britain there was a widely embraced expectation that the Messiah would return in the Hebrew year 1655/56, based on a theory that the prophecies related to Revelation 12:6 would be fulfilled 1260 years from the fall of the Roman Empire. In hindsight it was, of course, a false prophecy, but, at the time, the widespread belief in it fostered unprecedented unity and cooperation among Christians and Jews who prepared for it together from the early 1600s.

Among its chief Christian proponents was Scottish Millennialist, early Puritan theologian and friend/agent of Oliver Cromwell, John Dury (1596-1680), who attempted to establish a College of Jewish Studies in London (despite the ban on Jews living openly in England). The primary Jewish proponent of millennialism was Manasseh Ben Israel (1604-1657), the renowned “Rabbi of Amsterdam,” arguably the most influential Jew of the Renaissance era. 

The common denominator in the theology of these men was the Judeo-Christian doctrine of a future, earthly thousand-year Millennial Kingdom to be established by the coming of the Messiah: a second coming to the Christians; a (perceived) first coming to the Jews. Undergirding this remarkable movement was what I have called “the most important forgotten truth of the bible,” the “two-house covenant,” in which the House of Judah is defined by Judaism, and the House of Israel is defined by Christianity. If you do not know this doctrine in its original pristine form, and recognize its absolute centrality to Bible history and prophecy, then stop reading this article until you read THIS short summary first. 

Millennialism was the great divider of the Romanized form of Christianity that slowly emerged after the Apostolic Age ended, but has always been the great unifier of Bible-based Yahweh-worshipers (both Christians and Jews) who embrace a literalist view of Bible prophecy. Roman Catholicism largely expunged the doctrine from Christendom under Constantine, formally codifying the Roman revisionist view in the doctrine of “Amillennial”-ism (literally “no millennial” kingdom) by treating millennial passages as purely metaphorical. Eleven centuries later, some branches of Protestantism continued to reject millennialism, adopting a new doctrine called “post-millennialism,” contending that the millennial kingdom had come and gone starting with the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD.) (Why the next thousand years looked nothing at all like the prophecies describe is a question that never seems to get asked – but that’s a matter for another day.) 

But there was always a remnant of Millennialists in Christendom who emerged from time to time to the great irritation of the Roman Catholic Church. One very prominent emergence occurred in the 1400s in the Spanish Empire, becoming a leading motivator of the Spanish Inquisition’s campaign of forced conversions and brutal treatment of the Jews.

Among other things, the Jews were accused of “Judaizing” the Christians by seeking common ground with them in the millennial doctrine. While there had been many anti-Jewish pogroms in Christian history (just as followers of Jesus faced serious anti-Christian persecution at the hands of the Jews in the early years of the church), the Spanish Inquisition appears unique in that it triggered a sea-change in Jewish thinking, convincing them that their best defense against anti-Semitism going forward was to facilitate the breakup of the Roman Catholic monopoly in Christendom through the support of breakaway Christian sects which had also been targeted in the Inquisition. The most obvious faction to cultivate a partnership with was the Christian millennialists.

The most important early figure in the rise of what would later be called Protestantism was the Catholic theologian Johann Reuchlin (1455-1522), on par with Erasmus in terms of eminence and scholarship. Unfortunately for him, Reuchlin was haled before the Inquisitors under charges of heresy leveled by certain Catholic Dominicans because of his successful lobbying on behalf of the Jews against a ban on all Jewish books by Emperor Maximillian I of the Holy Roman Empire (who rescinded it). Reuchlin won the trial but endured vicious “cancel-culture” persecution for the rest of his life. That drama (and his preeminent scholarship on the Hebrew to English translation of the Old Testament) heavily influenced the young Martin Luther (then a staunch philo-Semite because of Reuchlin). Significantly, Luther published his 95 Theses that launched the Protestant Reformation in 1517 just one year after Reuchlin’s acquittal, suggesting that Luther’s perspective on the RCC had likely been influenced by witnessing Reuchlin’s ordeal.

Ground Zero for millennialism and the Hebraic Movement was Leyden, Holland, where many Jews had fled over the prior century to escape the Inquisition. Leyden became a base of operation for building a partnership with Christians in Great Britain, whose national anti-papal Anglican Church had become the strongest theological bulwark against the Church of Rome and whose increasingly constitutionalism-tolerant government had become the strongest political rival to the Spanish Empire.

Although Jews had been banned from England since 1290, the Hebraic perspective of the Bible had already swept through the British Isles like wildfire in the form of Presbyterianism. Luther’s reassertion of “the priesthood of all believers” (in direct contradiction to the ecclesiastic hierarchy of Catholicism and Anglicanism) had found fertile soil in philo-Semite John Knox’s Scotland, where the world-changing movement of “Scottish Covenanters” and their development of self-governance through covenantal oaths (e.g. the Mayflower Compact and Declaration of Independence) pioneered the political and theological ideals that would eventually define American constitutionalism.  

Along that road, those ideals made possible the “Republican Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland” under Oliver Cromwell in the 1650s, and triggered the Glorious Revolution in 1688. Not accidentally, Cromwell’s tenure marked the formal start of Anglo-Zionism – the political partnership of British Christians and Zionist Jews – which included a parallel theological track called British Israelism, rooted in millennialism. Cromwell’s inner circle included both John Dury and John Sadler (the Clerk of London), the latter of whom wrote one of the foundational documents of British Israelism. Both of these Christian millennialists heavily lobbied Cromwell to end the ban on Jews living in England, which he did in 1656.

After the Glorious Revolution (to oust the Roman Catholic King James II) had merged the Protestant British and Dutch monarchies (unifying the very two nations that were the power-bases of millennialism) the British Empire began a rapid, continuous geographic and geo-political expansion that only peaked in the early years of the 20th Century with 24% of the world’s surface under its control. 

Also along that road traveled the Pilgrim Separatists who landed one fateful day in November 1620 in Plymouth, Massachusetts, after a sojourn with the Jews in Leyden, Holland. Interestingly, the very first church built in Plymouth (a building I once spent a night in) is still standing there, on Leyden street, a monument to the blessings of Anglo-Zionism most Christians know almost nothing about.  

Among those blessings of Anglo-Zionism was the astonishing transformative spread across the globe of Jewish-tolerant Protestant Christianity by the British empire (and concomitant diminution of paganism), the establishment of the first, best and longest lasting constitutional republic in the history of the world (the US), and the worldwide normalization of the concept/practice of self governance under the rule of law, not men.

###   

This article is the first of a series called The History of Judeo-Christian Millennialism. The next is titled How Anglo-Zionism Turned Evil.

Some of the facts cited in this first article are drawn from the book “Jewish Christians and Christian Jews: From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment” edited by Richard H. Popkin and Gordon M. Weiner, which I highly recommend. I also recommend the book Judah’s Scepter and Joseph’s Birthright (1902) by JH Allen, which I consider to be the best basic summary in print of the two house covenant (though I do not endorse its claims regarding the doctrine/history of British Israelism itself, about 80% of which I believe are debunked.) For a deeper dive into the two house teaching, see my book The Prodigal Son Prophecy .

Ever since Oct. 7, 2023, I’ve kept a healthy distance from the propaganda war of the Israelis and the diverse pack of Sunni and Shiite Muslim warlords represented collectively by “The Palestinians.” If ever Israel had a true peer in the use of war propaganda to steer world opinion, it is they. I frankly take every bit of “news” in that real-world “Clash of the Titans” with a large grain of salt and keep my main focus on the larger geopolitical news-front which is harder for the elites on both sides to spin.

Admitting that the Israelis are master propagandists is not to say that my support for the nation state of Israel has diminished. On the contrary, it is to clarify that my support is based on Bible prophecy, not current events, and as such I know there is zero chance the Muslims will win their war to expel the Jews “from the river to the sea” while there is also zero chance that Israel will become a biblically righteous nation prior to the second coming of Christ.

In the not too distant future, probably under Trump, we will see the return of the Temple Mount to the direct control of the Jews and the return of animal sacrifices with or without the rebuilding of the Temple. There is scriptural ambiguity about whether a sacrificial altar could substitute for a fully reconstructed Temple (as was true under Ezra right after the Judean return from Babylon), but I think it most likely will be rebuilt.

The fight to build, activate and defend the Temple won’t make Israel biblically righteous, because the entire process and perspective denies the deity of Jesus Christ – Yeshua Hamashiach – which is the most important Truth of all history. And Scripture warns that this presumed Third Temple soon falls under the total control of the final Antichrist of Revelation, who sets up the Abomination that Causes Desolation there, following the pattern of Antiochus IV Epiphanes of Daniel 11 (described in detail in 1 & 2 Maccabees). All Hell will then, literally, be let loose to ravage the earth and humanity like never before … until Christ’s “military” intervention with the Host of Heaven per Revelation 19:11-21 and Zechariah 12 and 14.

The present battle of support for the Third Temple by Christian Zionists vs. efforts to dissuade them by Christian Anti-Zionists is completely moot and meaningless: This is God’s plan and it will happen.

This perspective I am espousing is called pre-Millennialism or futurism and assumes that the prophecies of the Bible about a future thousand-year Millennial Kingdom in which Jesus Christ rules from Jerusalem on the Throne of David are literally true and not metaphorical or symbolic.

That much of my eschatology will be familiar to many, but I have years of independent post-graduate study in biblical matters beyond the scope of the established camps, specifically the biblical theme of the division of Jacob’s progeny into two distinct “houses” that are only fully unified two times in human history: David’s Kingdom and Christ’s Millennial Kingdom. I believe from my studies that it is the unification of the two houses of the Hebrews, not any aspect of David’s conduct, which makes him the unique “type of Christ” of the Bible.

There is nothing in David’s conduct so distinct and superior from the other righteous kings of the Old Testament to truly qualify him for the comparison to the Messiah. Indeed, his conduct as a man of war disqualified him from having the honor of building the First Temple, and his horrific sins and their consequences related to the theft of Bathsheba from Uriah the Hittite greatly sabotaged their son Solomon spiritually. Only the full unification of the houses of Judah and Israel under the House of David merits his comparison to Christ. The fact that it was Solomon’s sins that caused God to rip the House of David into two again in the very next generation only strengthens my case: The only good and lasting fruit of David’s life was the political legacy of his own regency: “David’s Throne.”

This analysis is important relative to Donald Trump and the question whether he is the King David figure who will fully restore Jerusalem to the Judeans and oversee the rebuilding of the Temple. Some point to Trump’s character flaws and past sins to suggest he doesn’t qualify for that honor – but nothing he’s ever done remotely compares to David’s treatment of Uriah. I think the bigger question is whether Trump can bring true peace and unity to the Holy Land – and if that means by military force like David did, I think his capability is pretty much a given.

My WND column of July 22, 2024, emphasized “The danger of deifying Donald Trump” while acknowledging his obvious similarities to various Old Testament judges. I also compared his relationship and history relative to Joe Biden as akin to that of David and Saul.

I wrote: “Preceding David in Bible history as the first transitional monarch of the new order was King Saul – a Benjamite, not an ethnic Judean; an initially competent King who descended into mental illness under the dominion of a familiar spirit whose chief mission was to destroy David. The similarity to the Biden/Trump relationship is remarkable. (Even more so if one contemplates Barack Obama in the role of the familiar spirit). Additionally, the [first] assassination attempt on President Trump’s life has its parallel in 1 Samuel 10:6-11.”

I made the point that Saul had used a javelin – the ancient equivalent of a bullet – to try and kill David and added later in the piece: “Notably, David escaped Saul’s javelin twice, the second time recorded in 1 Samuel 19, so it’s possible we’ll see another failed attempt on Trump in the weeks or months ahead, if my analogy holds tightly.”

Now that Trump has in fact dodged the assassins’ javelin twice I think my case for the larger analogy of Trump to David is greatly strengthened.

Saul never stopped trying to destroy David, and it is clear the Biden administration will not stop trying to destroy Trump. Like Saul, Biden’s mental health has continued to deteriorate.

In my column I analogized Trump’s true nemesis, the Deep State, to the Philistines and Special Counsel Jack Smith to their champion Goliath. In the months since that was published, Joe Biden was forced out of his own re-election campaign by the Deep State, and he chose to “fall upon his own sword” rather than let them kill him (politically). As it happens that’s exactly what King Saul did in 1 Samuel 31:2-4 when the Philistines had defeated him in a long battle. His choice to literally fall on his own sword cleared the way for David to ascend to the throne – technically speaking.

However, the Philistines became the de-facto rulers of the land at that time per 1 Samuel 31:7 (just as the Deep State is now running America), and it took four chapters of persistent campaigning and coalition-building by David to gain the full backing of the Hebrew people against massive opposition. The Bible equivalent of an election happened fairly early in that process (2 Samuel 2:4), but the people remained deeply divided and polarized amidst great turmoil and strong challenges to David’s legitimacy.

It was only in 2 Samuel 5:1 that “all the tribes of Israel came [in full submission] to David at Hebron and said, “Here we are, your own flesh and blood.” David’s next acts after that, in sequence, were the military liberation of Jerusalem from the Jebusites, two mighty victories over the Philistines, and the triumphal transfer of the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem.

If my analogy holds true, Trump will win in November, the Deep State will try desperately after the election to keep him out of the White House but fail, and Trump will celebrate his victory over the Philistines by endorsing or sponsoring the Third Temple.

There’s always been a pot of gold for those willing to abuse power for the rainbow lobby.

I am a 30-year conservative Christian veteran of the scorched-earth global LGBT culture war against natural family values and the Bible. I’ve worn many hats in my career, including that of a constitutional law attorney. On Feb. 10, 2004, I happened to be in San Francisco to depose officials of the City of Oakland in my lawsuit against the town for discrimination against my clients: two African-American Christian women whose employment with the city had been threatened for trying to form a Good News Employee Association as a workplace alternative to the Gay and Lesbian Employee Association. I wrote about that case here.

By “chance” (i.e. divine providence) that was the day newly elected San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom held a press conference to stage the then-most audacious act of gay pandering in American history: He declared himself unilaterally authorized to legalize “gay marriage” in San Francisco by executive order.

Newsom became an instant political sensation on the hard left with that stunt, which everyone on both sides of the political aisle knew was a totally lawless act of grandstanding. My law partner and I filed a Writ of Mandamus to declare it invalid, which was denied, but only because the court had other means of invalidating Newsom’s order, which it did. Newsom didn’t care because it earned him the financial backing of the deep-pocketed LGBT political class – which later propelled him to the California governor’s office. He tried to recreate that event in June of 2024 to win the Democrat nomination for president, but got out-maneuvered by his partner in the 2004 event, Kamala Harris.

I scheduled my break in the depositions to be able to attend Newsom’s press conference. It was, of course, a media circus, but I managed to squirm my way into the venue just far enough to see Newsom at the podium flanked and backed by his various flunkies. I can’t say for certain, but I think that was my first glimpse of newly minted SF District Attorney Harris – elected just like Newsom two months prior. At some point over the next few days, perhaps even that day, Harris personally officiated one of the many illegal same-sex unions there at City Hall.

Here’s a little political background on the Newsom/Harris duo. Willie Brown was mayor of San Francisco from 1996-2004 and termed out.

Gavin Newsom inherited both the mayor’s office and Kamala Harris from Brown in the municipal elections of Nov. 4, 2003. Newsom was Brown’s “political protégé” while Harris was the septuagenarian’s 20-something former(?) arm-candy-with-benefits. Her gift from the Brown political patronage machine was the office of San Francisco district attorney.

What’s most important in this story, however, is the phenomenon of rank lawlessness in service to the normalization of LGBT behavioral disorders by highly compensated non-homosexual (or closeted) culture-war mercenaries. In my observation, this factor may be the most common denominator in all the stories of LGBT political conquest worldwide for the past half-century – including the massive trove of LGBT victories orchestrated by the Clintons and Barack Obama, who were funded to the hilt by “gay” money-bundlers like Terry Bean. Remember that Hillary gave her infamous MAGA “deplorables” speech at an LGBT Gala in NYC, the key takeaway being that the worst “deplorables” the left must destroy are opponents of the LGBT agenda.

Let’s segue now to the seemingly unrelated but ideologically connected breaking story of the new major leak scandal at the U.S. Supreme Court.

In summary, the Daily Caller article “‘Worse Than The Dobbs Leak’: Court Watchers Point To Supreme Court’s Liberal Wing As Likely Culprit Behind Latest Leak” suggests that Elana Kagan is the leaker, and I tend to agree. The leak pertains to internal communications about the Trump immunity cases, but the real story is abandonment of judicial ethics by court insiders to serve leftist politics.

Elena Kagan is no less a political opportunist and beneficiary of gender-class affirmative action than Kamala Harris. While Harris slept her way to power in San Francisco, Kagan leveraged her Manhattan family connections to rise through the Democrat ranks. She entered Obama’s orbit in 1991, helped Ruth Bader Ginsburg get confirmed to SCOTUS while a Senate aide, then, rising that same wave of female political empowerment, was appointed the first female dean of Harvard Law – where the LGBT agenda reigns supreme. (To that latter point, read about my experience debating criminal justice reform there as a gubernatorial candidate in 2014.)

Harris and Kagan are both just hard left political assets with a law degree and an unshakable commitment to the LGBT agenda. When Kagan (with no prior judicial experience) joined Ginsburg on the high court they tag-teamed as officiants in separate same-sex “marriages” during the pendency of the Obergefell v. Hodges case, the worst breach of judicial ethics in the history of the Supreme Court. This was far worse than anything the conservative justices have been accused of in recent months by the same partisans who applauded the Obergefell travesty. And no one but me (with a protest sign in front of the courthouse) publicly clamored for their recusal for that! (Of course, the “gay marriage” Kagan performed was for her own law clerk and his male partner.)

There is nothing more sacrosanct in our judiciary than the expectation of all parties to a presumption of impartiality by the justices deciding their case regardless of their personal views – but, once again, advancing LGBT normalization trumped every other consideration, even the integrity of the court. Compared to that, leaking internal confidences about the Trump cases to the New York Times is kid stuff.

The rule of law will not survive in America so long as we allow power-hungry people to get away with trading their ethics for a grab at the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. There must be accountability. For Harris that would mean a massive election defeat in November. For Kagan (if she truly is the leaker) that would mean impeachment during Trump’s next term.

Trigger warning: This article employs a term that is considered the most “homophobic” of slurs against men who suffer with Same-Sex Attraction Disorder (SSAD). If you are a person so incapable of objectivity in LGBT matters that you cannot separate actual hatred and bigotry from dispassionate academic discourse, STOP HERE.

Caveat: While I have used the term “homophobic” in the above trigger warning, I contend that the term “homophobia” and its derivatives are no less offensive and demeaning to defenders of the natural family and traditional sexual morality than the term “faggot” is to men afflicted with SSADness. A slur is a slur, and none of them has a legitimate place in civil discourse.

What is fascism?

When it comes to speaking hard truths about things dear to the hearts of liberals I like using Wikipedia for a source, because of its well-known liberal bias on all topics important to leftist narrative-setters. When Wikipedia states facts that undermine liberal narratives it offers fodder for conservatives to use that bear such a high level of trustworthiness that our legal system has a special category for them in the rules of evidence. They are called “admissions against interest” and are assumed prima facie (on their face) to be true, because it is assumed that guilty people would normally try to hide such facts from the judge and jury.

Since American intellectuals like to emphasize the strength of their arguments with Latin phrases, let’s look at the Latin origin of the word fascism.

According to Wikipedia, “Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a 1) far-right, 2) authoritarian, 3) ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a 4) dictatorial leader, 5) centralized autocracy, 6) militarism, 7) forcible suppression of opposition, 8) belief in a natural social hierarchy, 9) subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and 10) strong regimentation of society and the economy.” [Emphasis added to number and highlight the 10 defining characteristics of fascism.]

“… The Italian term fascismo is derived from fascio, meaning ‘bundle of sticks,’ ultimately from the Latin word fasces. This was the name given to political organizations in Italy known as fasci, groups similar to guilds or syndicates. According to Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini’s own account, the Fasces of Revolutionary Action were founded in Italy in 1915. In 1919, Mussolini founded the Italian Fasces of Combat in Milan, which became the National Fascist Party two years later.

We’ll address the second paragraph first to study the what and why of fascism’s etymology, and then return to the first paragraph to ask which factions on the American culture-war battlefield actually fit the term.

To cut right to the quick, let’s bring in Wikipedia’s most shocking admission, from it’s entry on the word “Faggot” as a pejorative against homosexual men.

The first recorded use of faggot as a pejorative term for gay men was in the 1914 “A Vocabulary of Criminal Slang,” while the shortened form “fag” first appeared in 1923 in “The Hobo” by Nels Anderson. Its immediate origin is unclear, but it is based on the word for “bundle of sticks,” ultimately derived, via Old French, Italian and Vulgar Latin, from Latin fasces.

The connection is prima facie self-evident, but the reason is hidden under layers of obfuscation. Here is where the “admissions against interest” end, and the wall of censorship and suppression rises.

The formalization of fascism in Italy as an ideological movement followed almost two decades of de-facto fascism by the German Gemeinschaft der Eigene “Community of the Elite” – a movement of ultra-masculine “butch” homosexuals who taught that homosexuals of their type had been the founders of all nation-states through history (research Adolf Brand, Hans Blueher and Benedict Friedlander). Their underground network of like-minded homosexuals transcended national boundaries, especially with Italy, where the German industrial titan and predatory pederast and international armaments king Friedrich Krupp set up his own “Epstein Island” of boys on Capri in 1904. The Krupp company later became a major arms supplier of Benito Mussolini’s regime.

Fascism finally came out of the closet as an organized political ideology when Mussolini established his Fasci Italiani di Combattimento (Italian Combat Leagues) in 1919, the same year the Nazi Party was formed in Germany.

Importantly, the Butches did not think of themselves as “homosexuals,” a term associated with the effeminate “gay” men aligned with the higher-profile Karl Heirich Ulrichs and his Scientific Humanitarian Committee devoted to repealing Germany’s sodomy laws. The Butches and Femmes were deadly enemies – which is why “homosexuals” were publicly shunned and disparaged in both Germany and Italy, while the Butches of the “Mannerbund” (militaristic all-male society) were everywhere esteemed as paragons of masculinity. Unlike the Femmes, the Butches kept their sex lives as secret as possible, but the truth was well know to the elites and style-setters, and that’s the inside joke about the link of “fascism” and “faggots.”

Mock this brief summary if you choose, but my 6th Edition of “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party” (in progress) offers over 500 pages of unimpeachable proof of its larger thesis, of which this topic is a small part. Read the 4th Edition if you can’t wait for the upgraded 6th).

Turning back to Wikipedia’s first paragraph on “Fascism,” I highlighted the 10 characteristics it says defines “Fascism.” 1 & 3, “far-right” and “ultranationalist” are redundant, being synonymous opposites to internationalism” (more precisely “one-worldism”), which is a central tenet of Communism. The remainder are all obvious characteristics of the American hard left, not the right. The American right is still defined by its love – indeed demand for – constitutionalism, government by limited delegated authority, opposition to “forever wars,” self-determination not governmental dictates, and provably fair and honest elections and election laws.

Taking for our examples only the COVID plandemic, Ukraine policy and the “Green New Deal,” it is clearly the left that exemplifies authoritarianism, dictatorial leadership, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy (based on ideology), subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race (i.e. racial minorities), and strong regimentation of society and the economy. To those I would add, the “groomer” obsession with total cultural supremacy of all things LGBT – evolved from Butch fascist origins in the on-again/off-again partnership of Germany and Italy – and sustained into the future through the relentless indoctrination of schoolchildren.

Out of their own mouths, the leftist “fact checkers” of Wikipedia condemn themselves.

Anyone who’s ever looked deeply into the well of human sexual depravity will recognize that all deviance is measured against the standard of true normalcy: monogamous binary heterosexuality. It is a universal human norm, known in Christendom as the One-Flesh Paradigm, based on Genesis 1:27 and 2:24. Faithful Jews and Christians adhere to this standard, or at least aspire to do so.

The sinfulness/harmfulness of any given sexual act, inclination or relationship is judged by God and His law based upon its degree of its deviance from the standard. The acts, inclinations and relationships most similar to the standard are judged least harshly in the Bible. These include female concubinage (a man having a “mistress” with or without the knowledge or permission of the wife), bigamy (two wives) and polygamy. These forms of deviance are actually tolerated in the Mosaic Law in the way and for the reason divorce is tolerated there. Introducing the terms of the New Covenant about 1,300 years later, Jesus explained that those laxities were temporary accommodations to human weakness in the Old Covenant: “because of the hardness of your hearts.” Humanity wasn’t morally evolved enough to meet the higher standard in the days of Moses, and so God left some wiggle-room in the law.

Make no mistake: There are always negative consequences for violating the standard, even within the limits of the Mosaic law, because anything humans do that is “out of order” has ripple effects that compound over time (just look at the lives of most divorced people and their children). Jesus thus began his Sermon on the Mount by contrasting the letter of the old law with the spirit of the law that He now would expect humanity to faithfully embrace – at least aspirationally. Implicit in his exhortation to that higher standard was the truth that no one could actually meet that standard perfectly except Himself, which was why he explained, “I Am the Way, the Truth and the Life, no one comes to the Father except by Me.”

Now, the other end of the spectrum of deviance – the collection of most-deviant sexual sins cataloged in Leviticus 18 – was NEVER accommodated by God but in fact was always punished with death (physical and/or spiritual). That harshness was re-affirmed in the New Covenant in Paul’s treatise on Christian theology in Romans 1-8, particularly chapter 1:18-32. That remains God’s law to this day, notwithstanding the opinions of any human revisionists. Thank God for Grace and Mercy in Jesus Christ – the only path of escape from that fate.

So when you look down the well of sexual depravity you can see that all the way on the bottom are the most deviant behaviors of all: homosexuality and bestiality, in that order (Leviticus 18:22-23 – the original source of British and American sodomy laws), because they’re the farthest from the One Flesh Paradigm.

About halfway down that well is Epstein’s island, where you can see super rich and powerful adult men preying on “underage” girls collected there for their sexual pleasure. And you can see the sleazy adult women who helped facilitate that. (If you look even more carefully, you can see all the “honey-pot” hidden cameras gathering evidence for blackmail.)

We’re all rightfully scandalized by Epstein Island, but to put it in perspective, the girl victims are sexually mature and technically of marriageable age. The sex they’re involved with isn’t much different from the concubinage allowed in the Mosaic Law. It deserves condemnation, but the bigger question is where are the Epstein Islands of the more deviant kind? You know they must be out there somewhere in real life, hidden beneath the dark conspiratorial clouds of the “pizzagates” and Franklin cover-ups – because evil people of means have always pursued their lusts from time immemorial.

In my research for “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party,” I’ve discovered one of history’s “Epstein Islands” of boys – the Island of Capri, Italy. Here is an excerpt from the 6th edition (in progress):

According to Edward Rothstein, in a July 6, 2002, New York Times editorial titled “Is There a Gay Basis to Nietzsche’s Ideas,” “Richard Wagner spread rumors that Nietzsche suffered from the side-effects of excessive masturbation and, perhaps, pederasty.” The Rothstein editorial was based primarily upon the book “Zarathustra’s Secret: The Interior Life of Friedrich Nietzsche” by Joachim Kohler. The flyleaf of that book describes its thesis: “In a revealing reinterpretation of his letters, diaries and writings, Kohler shows that Nietzsche’s suppressed homosexuality, generating a hatred of Christianity and conventional morality, was a central influence on his work.”

Kohler writes: “The hidden yearning nestling behind Nietzsche’s hatred of morality and of secrecy had as its goal the world of handsome, healthy bodies in a reborn antiquity. … In Italy he found what he had been looking for.” (Kohler:xvi). “In the work of August von Platen, who had inspired his novella ‘Capri,’ Nietzsche found what he needed…In Italy, wrote Platen, ‘love between men and men is so common that even the boldest of demands do not meet with a rejection.’ … Throughout the nineteenth century and far into the twentieth the exiles from Sodom sought a new home in the ‘warm south.’ Nietzsche joined them: ‘I flew across the sea to the south,’ he wrote.” (ibid:161)

[But those weren’t mere rumors.] … According to Macintyre in “Forgotten Fatherland: The Search For Elisabeth Nietzsche,” Frederich Nietzsche never married and had no known female sex partners, but went insane at age 44 and eventually died of syphilis. According to Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, Nietzsche had caught the disease at a homosexual brothel in Genoa, Italy (McIntyre:91f). [But it might well have been Capri instead.]

… The German police had a secret file about highly placed homosexuals who might be liable to scandal and blackmail. It included dossiers on the armaments king, Friedrich Krupp, one of the Kaiser’s brothers, the Kaiser’s aide, Prince Eulenberg, the Kaiserin’s private secretary, Count Kuno von Moltke and others. [Krupp] was married, but he and his wife lived separately so that he could lavishly indulge his homosexual desires. At his Grotto of Fra Felice, a cave above the sea on Capri, he created a private pleasure palace where he …[became notorious for] seducing minors.

I suspect Portland, Oregon, had its own version of this and still does. In the late ’80s, my wife worked as a volunteer for the Salvation Army in a Portland program for street kids and was told that many of the teen boy street hustlers were “graduates” of a string of “floating brothels” of pre-teen boys. (Word was that once they got too old to appeal to the rich Portland pedophiles they were kicked out on the street.) I think this is much more common than people believe.

We should all treat the Epstein Island case as a tip-of-the-iceberg phenomenon and keep looking deeper to find and expose the worse scandals and rescue the victims – using everything we find as evidence that God’s standard has always been right in every respect.

For more on this topic see “The Pink Swastika” 4th Edition here.

I have been very impressed with the anti-DEI efforts of conservative activist Robby Starbuck. In just the past year he has persuaded multiple major corporations, including Tractor Supply, John Deere, Harley-Davidson, Jack Daniel’s, Lowe’s and Ford Motor Co., to scale back or end their cooperation with the homo-fascists behind the Diversity Equity and Inclusion mandates being forced upon the business world in this country. He’s a fellow Tennessee transplant from California whom I’ve never met, but I’d like to help him and all those fighting this heroic battle by offering a little helpful history on the main driving force behind those DEI mandates, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the world’s largest LGBT lobbying organization and political action committee.

In the interest of full disclosure, I am not a disinterested party in this matter. The HRC published a dossier on me about a decade ago, funded by the reprobate RINO megadonor Paul Singer, naming me public enemy No. 1 of the LGBT agenda internationally. Truth be told, those were my glory days in the pro-family movement – the peak of which was pushing for a ban on LGBT propaganda to children in a 50 city tour of the former Soviet Union, including many stops in Russia, which actually passed that law in 2013. These days I’m pretty much a groundskeeper on my son’s farm, focused on publishing my sixth and dramatically expanded final edition of “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party” (my “magnum opus”). (Get the fourth edition here.)

Here’s some of the new material I’ve just included in the book’s sixth manuscript in a section comparing the pederasty at the heart of Nazism with that among powerful homosexuals in the USA today:

[Begin excerpt.] In November of 2014 , Terry Bean, founder of the world’s largest and most powerful LGBT lobbying organization and political action committee, the Human Rights Campaign, was charged in Lane County, Oregon, with the pederastic abuse of a 15-year-old boy, specifically two felony counts of sodomy in the third degree, and one misdemeanor count of sex abuse in the third degree.

The Willamette Week wrote: Bean made millions as a real estate developer and used his wealth to promote political causes, primarily gay rights. He is a founder of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s leading gay-rights organization and has given more than $1 million to the group. He has also been a central figure in national Democratic politics. As WW reported in June: “No Oregonian has raised more money for President Barack Obama. At a 2009 Human Rights Campaign dinner, Obama called Bean a ‘great friend and supporter.’ The president in 2012 hosted Bean on Air Force One, and when Obama visits Oregon, Bean has had the honor of greeting him as the president gets off his plane.”

The Willamette Week newspaper, based in Portland, is no enemy of LGBT causes. This same paper had been caught with egg on its face for endorsing openly “gay” Sam Adams for mayor of Portland (despite allegations of pederasty against him) when he later admitted he lied about having a sexual affair with a teenage boy.

The Terry Bean saga did not end with a simple trial and sentence, however. The original trial never occurred because Bean “reached a settlement” with the complainant in the sum of $200,000. The judge, it appears, had allowed Bean to “buy off” the victim, and the case was dismissed to the shock of prosecutors and the public. The following is from an article in the Eugene Register Guard of Jan. 18, 2019:

“In 2015, when the case was dropped, Prosecutor Scott Healy wrote in his objection that he had ‘never seen a civil compromise agreement offered in a case this serious. … It was somewhat of a surprise to find out such a remedy was even available in a child sex abuse case,’ Healy wrote. ‘Normally, such a remedy is suggested in low-level property crime cases where the facts are not too aggravated and the defendant has no prior criminal record or history of similar conduct. This is not the case here.’ Healy characterized Bean as a predator with a ‘history of targeting, grooming and victimizing young teenage boys for his own sexual exploitation.'”

But the Bean soap opera did not end there. In 2019, the alleged victim (now an adult) re-emerged and Bean was criminally re-indicted. The man further filed a $6.5 million civil suit against the attorney, Lori Deveny, who had represented him in the 2015 “settlement,” whom he alleged had pocketed most of the money from Bean herself and gave him just $5,000. Reported the Register Guard: “The man also alleges Deveny forged his signature on the agreement and provided him with negligent advice against the orders of a judge to accept the payment from Bean. … [She] hid the boy and his guardian from the Lane County District Attorney’s Office in various places around Oregon until the case against Bean was dismissed in 2015, the lawsuit states. … According to the [Oregon State] bar’s database online, Deveny was suspended in April and resigned in July of [2019].”

The Bean criminal case was not resolved until Jan. 14, 2022, when all charges against him were dismissed because the alleged victim “declined to participate” in prosecution. [Jaquiss, Nigel (January 14, 2022). “State Dismisses Criminal Sex Abuse Charges Against Terry Bean.” Willamette Week. Retrieved 2022-01-15.”] [End Excerpt.]

Now, given that mere association with out-of-favor historical figures has been sufficient cause in the logic of DEI advocates to cancel countless conservatives and remove statues and other historic artifacts from public lands, it stands to reason that the Human Rights Campaign should be held to account for its association with its own founder, Terry Bean. At the very least, all future invocations of the name Human Rights Campaign or its acronym HRC should be accompanied by the reminder that it was founded by an accused pederast.

The fact Bean is merely “accused” and not convicted and jailed (as was his non-politically-connected co-defendant) seems to be another example of the abuse of power in our two-tiered justice system. As Assistant DA William Oakley said to “Saul Goodman” in the comedy-drama series “Better Call Saul” about Goodman’s similarly dubious escape from justice: “There’s proving and then there’s knowing”

It would be good for the corporate giants being bent to the will of the depraved HRC to know who they’re actually in bed with.

The next time some smarmy leftist calls the MAGA movement fascist, hit back with the truth.

Since WWII Americans have been so saturated with facts and fiction about Nazi Germany that most people think they know its history pretty well, and in some respects they do. But the narratives that shape public perception about a topic do not always tell the whole truth. Indeed, sometimes the narratives intentionally suppress and obscure facts that powerful interests want to shove deep into history’s closets.

Such is the case with Germany’s status as the birthplace of the modern “gay” movement and the central role of that movement in the rise and rule of the Nazi Party. These facts have been purged from the narratives and replaced with a cynical mythology about the Nazi persecution of “gays.”

As with most effective lies, there’s a grain of truth or two to make it believable, but the actual whole-truth of the matter is so stunningly contradictory to the popular narrative as to be breathtaking. When you finally see the strength and sheer volume of the evidence, you wonder how the liars could have pulled off a cover-up of such magnitude. (Given that I’m writing this just after the astonishing gaslighting efforts of the Democrat National Convention of 2024, that level of audacity doesn’t seem so implausible.)

Finding the proof is actually not that hard if you know where to look. Ironically, a great many of the best sources are the early 20th century Marxist counterparts and predecessors of today’s most oppressive censors. In the 1920s and ’30s, the hard left intentionally exposed and documented the homosexuality of the Nazis because, although they were fellow Marxists in the sense of the Nazis being “National Socialists,” they were fierce political rivals for control of Germany. Commies and Socialists are often deadly enemies (e.g., the Bernie Sanders/AOC bloc vs. Pelosi and the Clintons).

After the war, however, when the Marxist priority shifted to eliminating Christianity as its main rival in the world’s new superpower, America, their primary strategy was “sexual revolution” (aka sexual anarchy), and for that to work they needed to hide just how socially corrosive widespread homosexuality really is. It just wouldn’t do to have their own cultural storm troops being compared side by side to Germany’s.

The first phase of sexual revolution was relatively tame and almost exclusively heterosexually oriented. The SSADs (sufferers of Same-Sex Attraction Disorder) needed to sexually compromise the Normies before pushing the envelope into more deviant territory. That was “mission accomplished” by the 1960s, making hard-leftist political control possible nationally under LBJ, while making censorship of the homo-fascism of pre-war Germany urgently necessary before they could unleashed their own overtly homo-fascist campaign. It was in the early ’60s that the suppression of the truth about Nazi Germany really started getting heavy.

Their war plans were delayed until the days-long Stonewall Riots began June 28, 1969, “Gay Pride Day.” That was the anniversary of the very weekend on which the German “Night of the Long Knives ” occurred in 1934: the so-called “Roehm Purge.” While not necessarily planned in advance, it was instantly adopted as the birthday of hardcore militancy by “gay” leaders.

On that first “Gay Pride Day,” Roehm-style homo-fascism arose like a Phoenix from the ashes, relentlessly focused on total cultural supremacy over Christianity, following Italian Marxist Antonio Gramschi’s model of methodic incremental change at the institutional level – coerced by constant pressure from the street and the media. German-born immigrant and Cultural Marxism pioneer Herbert Marcuse had long set the guiding narratives from high on his perch in the pre-CIA Office of Strategic Services (OSS) from which he flittered like Tinker Bell from one Ivy League university to the next as the “fair-haired boy” of the American intelligentsia. All with a strong assist since the late 1940s by fraudulent “sex researcher,” social engineer and pan-sexualist pervert Alfred Kinsey, backed by the Rockefellers. By ’69 the entire network was fully prepped for cultural Blitzkreig.

In the American reiteration, however, the SSADs would not make the fatal mistake of disunity, having learned from the German experience the hard lesson that “a house divided cannot stand.” Thus came the post-Stonewall emergence of an unbreakable coalition of “sexual minorities” under the LGBT banner. Their differences were hashed out in a Chicago conference of 200 entities that produced one common agenda called the 1972 Gay Rights Platform, a list of demands to federal and state governments including all the priorities of the various factions presented as a single package. It even included the priority of the pederasts and pedophiles, which became Item 7 of the Demand for States: “Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent” (the only demand still not granted – although the MAPs Maneuver and the Lincoln Project are edging them closer).

The LGBT street-activists then took the battle to the streets – targeting the American Psychiatric Association (APA) first with Brownshirt-style pubic harassment and disruptions (which they called “zapping”) of any medical professionals unwilling to remove the behavioral disorder of homosexuality from the list of mental disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM4), the “bible” of the mental health profession. Within a year they forced a politically, not scientifically, driven vote-by-mail in the APA (of which they controlled the mailing list), and viola, homosexuality was no longer a behavioral disorder, and the APA forever after belonged to LGBT Borg.

Immediately on the heels of the APA conquest, “closeted” Cultural Marxist forces who had long been marbled through the elite strata of society, forced open to LGBTs the previously closed doors of K-12 academia and many other culture-shaping professions. Before long they controlled them all, although it wasn’t until Bill Clinton issued Executive Order 12968 that they apparently got control of U.S. intelligence agencies, too.

That, in a nutshell, is the concise history of the American culture war that has evolved into the DEI and child grooming/mutilating nightmare Donald Trump and the MAGA movement promise to end.

The American left is fond of equating the MAGA movement with fascism, when they themselves are the true Brownshirts as proven by their actions. The common impulse when being falsely accused of “hatred” is to take some step of compromise to try and prove you’re not. IT’S A TRAP. They’ll never concede you’re not a hater, no matter how much you pander, and you’ll end up just diminishing your inherent moral authority as a Normie.

My appeal to the MAGA patriots is this: Don’t fall prey to the leftist narrative that “sexual orientations” are harmless equivalents to normal sexuality and the natural family. Don’t give in to virtue signaling impulses on, for example, so-called “gay marriage” to try and “soften” your stance against transgenderism. Always say YES to sympathy, compassion and reasonable tolerance for those who suffer from Gender Identity Confusion and/or SSADness, but never shrink from your duty to protect society from the harmful LGBT political and cultural agenda.

For more on this topic, read “The Pink Swastika” here. (A 6th Edition is in process.)

Adolf Hitler did not create the Third Reich – it created him. What started as a nationalist movement dominated by butch male homosexuals grew from an idea to an empire, and as it did these ambitious men literally groomed the young Adolf in both the modern and the old-school meaning of the term.

The Third Reich was a German inevitability: No nation ever escapes the dream of recapturing its former greatness, which in Germany’s history was no less a world power than Charlemagne’s thousand-year Holy Roman Empire. Otto von Bismarck tried to recreate it in 1871 with his Second Reich, which died in World War I under the mismanagement and unshakable homosexual scandals of Kaiser (Caesar) Wilhelm II (research the Eulenberg Affair). But the third effort was launched while the second was still a pile of smoldering embers, while Adolf Hitler was just a teenage street hustler turning tricks in Munich and Vienna to fund his aspiring career as an artist (a fact today’s gay-pandering leftists would self-immolate before admitting as reflected in Wikipedia’s faux-disinterested but desperately dishonest dismissal of Lothar Machtan’s documentation-packed exposé “The Hidden Hitler”).

Hitler’s earliest influence was “The Man Who Gave Hitler His Ideas,” Jorg Lanz von Liebenfels, the presumably homosexual former Catholic monk who was expelled from the Cistercian Order for “worldly and carnal desires” and who published Adolf’s favorite magazine, Ostara. Lanz was given that title by German psychologist Wilfried Daim who catalogs and elaborates on the numerous ways Lanz shaped Hitler’s worldview in his 1957 book of that title.

Lanz, along with occult partner and “rune” expert Guido von List, headed Helena Blavatski’s Theosophist movement in Germany and published its magazine, Lucifer, which featured a swastika in its emblem. Lanz was the first to fly the swastika flag in Germany, in 1907 over an old castle he bought to run his operations from, including the homo-occultic “Germanen Order” that later morphed into the National Socialist German Workers Party.

Heavily suppressed post-WWII by the leftist-controlled press and publishing world in the U.S. and Europe, Hitler’s start as a boy prostitute and his lifetime preference for male homosexual associates was already well-known in Germany in the early days of the Nazi Party – documented in police records and by multiple witnesses. UNTIL, that is, the “Night of the Long Knives” in 1934 when just about anyone who knew Hitler’s secrets –friends and foes alike – were murdered and the evidence purged: literally hundreds of people. (But some witnesses and evidence about Hitler and the “gay” Nazis survived as Kevin Abrams and I invested years of our lives documenting in “The Pink Swastika”).

It was Jewish-born news journalist and publisher Maximillian Harden (and the Jewish editors of the Munich Post) who made sure the German public knew that the nationalist/monarchist movement was rife with homosexuality. In 1906 Harden heroically exposed the homosexual cabal that controlled the young Kaiser and kept that scandal alive until Wilhelm (according to some observers) launched WWI to deflect attention from the years-long public trials and their aftermath that threatened his reign. It is said that Hitler’s hatred of the Jews began then, when the Prussian “gay” war heroes at the heart of the Eulenberg scandal were being dragged through the mud for the very sexual orientation Adolf shared with them. The timeline he relates in “Mein Kampf” about his attitude toward Jews fits this theory.

Hitler was a nobody in the military-dominated nationalist movement. He emerged from WWI as a lowly corporal with the taint of a barely hidden homosexual relationship with a fellow soldier hanging over him, which was perhaps what attracted Capt. Ernst Roehm to him. Even today’s leftist propaganda machine can’t bury Roehm’s homo-fascist personae and history, so notorious was he as the founder of the Sturmagteilung (SA) Storm Troopers. For example, a Munich Post article of June 1931was headlined “Warm Brotherhood in [Roehm’s SA] Brown House: Sexual Life in the Third Reich” and began “Every knowledgeable person knows … that inside the Hitler Party the most flagrant [homosexual] whorishness … is widespread.”

Roehm had been recruited into homosexuality by Gerhard Rossbach whose “Rossbachbund” troop of all or mostly homosexual ex-soldiers was called the Brown Shirts because he clothed them in the leftover brown uniforms of Germany’s defeated African colonies – as distinct from the grey uniforms worn by all the other Freicorps. Roehm took command of the troop from Rossbach, and by 1932 had built his Brown Shirted SA to a force 3 million strong – a true threat to the traditional army limited by the Treaty of Versailles to 100,000 (which was the real reason Roehm was killed by Hitler in ’34 at the insistence of President Hindenberg and the military/industrial powers; purging the “gays” was a cover story only partially true).

Roehm was the true power behind Hitler’s throne until his murder: a part of the early leadership circle that prized the young Adolf’s skill for oratory and his passionate hatred of the Communists – whose bands of street fighters were pressing hard into Germany through Bavaria in the late 1910s and early ’20s hoping to repeat their recent victory over Russia. Roehm’s fast-growing fascist SA army, for which Hitler was at first just a figurehead, was recognized by the Socialist Weimar government as its best hope for defeating the Reds and gave them a long leash (at least until the Beerhall Putsch of November ’23 – but by then the Nazi movement proved too strong to kill).

The Third Reich vision and movement was older and broader that the Nazi movement that assimilated it, but nearly every symbol, practice and policy that is emblematic of Nazism also became synonymous with the Third Reich. Importantly, nearly all of these icons originated in one or another of the factions of German’s huge “gay” subculture, specifically those of the butch male persuasion, in contrast to the “femmes” who aligned with the Communists, explaining why many effeminate “gays” (called kummerlings – “puny beings” by the butches) got persecuted and sent to camps by fellow deviants on the Fascist side.

It was the butch-“gay” vision of a homoerotic military hierarchy – popularized by the pederast group Der Meinschaft der Eigene, and implemented by “gay” leaders like Rossbach and Roehm – that produced the Nazi social order. It was in the Wandervogel youth movement built on that mannerbund model where the Seig Heil salute and semi-religious leadership designation “Der Fuhrer” were popularized. That organization was made infamous as a homosexual grooming operation by the brazenly frank 1912 book, “The Wandervogel Movement as an Erotic Phenomenon,” by Wandervogel leader Hans Blueher, and later morphed into the Hitler Youth.

The homo-occult movement of Lanz, List et al. gave the Nazis their swastika and numerous runic symbols such as the single and double lightning bolt, and inspired Heinrich Himmler to spawn the military-occultic order called the SS and its demonic Gestapo. The list goes on and on – all documented by reliable sources, most of which are either well-respected mainstream reporters or self-admitted “gay” journalists or historians.

The term “Third Reich” was never a part of any official declaration by Adolf Hitler, even after the Nazis long march to power put him in the office of German chancellor in 1932. It was only after he orchestrated the Reichstag Fire in 1933 to solidify his control over the legislature that the Nazi Party, not specifically he, adopted the increasingly common public reference to a Third Reich as its own. In reality, the term embodied the vision of the ultra-masculine social and political movement upon whose tide Hitler rose to power – a vision most clearly articulated by a 1923 book on nationalist theory by Arthur Moeller van den Bruck’s titled “Das Dritte Reich” (The Third Empire). Bottom line, the butch-“gay”-dominated Third Reich movement created Hitler, not him it.

WND publishes my regular columns on Tuesdays. Today’s posting corresponds with the deeply solemn Ninth of Av on the Hebrew calendar – the anniversary of the Hebrews’ fatal failure to obey God’s command to invade the Holy Land from the south under Moses. There is a reasonable risk that Iran will choose today to retaliate against Israel for its recent presumed assassination of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyehin in Tehran, and I urge prayer that any such attack will be thwarted or minimized. [Update: Iran has reportedly delayed it’s revenge pending U.S. talks … we’ll see.]

This is the third in a series that began with my article “Zionism and the ‘Last Days War’ for Israel” and continued with the sequel, “Islamo-Hebrew Relations from Hagar to Hamas.” In this article, I want to expand upon a point I made in the second piece. I wrote, “Most in Christendom who battle over ‘Zionism’ wrongly think the fight is about the ‘goodness’ or ‘evil’ of the modern House of Judah relative to its possession of the Holy Land.” However, Judah’s land rights (while subject in the longer term to the mandate of Leviticus 18:24-30) are not “merit based” in any short-term sense of the phrase.

I frequently debate anti-Zionists who erroneously characterize me as a “Christian Zionist” (a slur from their perspective). I am neither a Christian Zionist nor an Anti-Zionist. I consider myself a Two-House Millennialist, which means I believe the Bible’s prophecy, best summarized in Ezekiel 37:15-28, of a future earthy kingdom under Christ, exemplified by the reunification of the two Hebrew houses between which God’s covenant was divided under Jacob. As I explained in the first article, “Zionism” has been defined since it was formalized in Great Britain in 1897, by exclusive control of the Holy Land by the House of Judah. I happen to support the Jewish land claim but not the premise of one-house Zionism. And, incidentally, I don’t base my support upon the claim of moral right due to Jewish suffering in the Holocaust and centuries of horrific pogroms – which persecutions I vigorously deplore.

My support is based almost entirely on Bible prophecy because prophecy reflects the will and plan of God, not the priorities and traditions of men. My first article addressed God’s eternal covenantal land grant to the descendants of Jacob, but here is the path of some additional proof-texts I follow:

God’s unbreakable and perpetual covenant promised Abraham that “Your descendants will possess the gates of their enemies” (Genesis 22:17b). This explains the phenomenon of outsized Hebrew influence in the affairs of the world throughout history. Its practical manifestation is clearly showcased in the Bible in the lives of Joseph (House of Israel) and Daniel (House of Judah per Daniel 1:6).

Joseph rose from suffering in prison to sit “second chair” to Pharaoh and controlled Egyptian domestic and foreign policy as it related to the priorities of the Hebrews. When the seven-year famine he had prophesied occurred, he used the crisis he had planned for to vastly enrich and empower the Pharaonic Dynasty, which he served as its de facto central banker/trade minister, while saving the entire region from starvation (Genesis 41-43).

Daniel rose from the role of Judean captive to sit “second chair” to King Nebuchadnezzar. “[T]he king promoted Daniel and gave him many generous gifts. He made him ruler over the entire province of Babylon and chief administrator over all the wise men of Babylon. And at Daniel’s request, the king appointed Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego to manage the province of Babylon, while Daniel remained in the king’s court” (Daniel 1-2, especially 2:48-49).

This is the same model we have seen during much of the Gentile Age – Jewish trade and banking powers aligned with Christian monarchies and steering domestic and foreign policies largely with benign effect for the empires in which they sit “second chair” (the best and most recent example being Great Britain). This well-documented historical truth is characterized as an anti-Semitic trope because of the violent reaction of supersessionist Christians who believe the Christian church fully supplanted the Hebrews at the First Advent of Christ, but it is in fact the outworking of the will of God and a fixed aspect of human civilization since Abraham that will only end at the Second Advent of Christ, when the Jews collectively do finally receive Him per Romans 11:25.

This is not to say the policy-steering Hebrew powers are always benign, because they’re not. They’ve always been a mixed bag (read Jeremiah 24). Indeed, as measured by the yardstick of Leviticus 18, we are presently in a season of malignancy and abominations – which will be punished by God as it was of old: with the desolation of the land in His perfect timing.

For Christian end-time prophecy (outlined by Christ Himself in Matthew 24:3-26:1) to be fulfilled, the House of Judah must be in possession of the Holy Land. It’s people must succumb to the deceptions of the false-Christ Antichrist that only the “elect” (defined in Romans 11:5-7 – essentially Messianic Jews saved by grace) will recognize as a fraud. And it must suffer the “time of Jacob’s trouble” as a consequence of rejecting Jesus Christ at His first coming. It is living under Christ’s curse of Matthew 23:37-39 until it finally bends the knee to Him in the events described in Zechariah 14 (note the exclusive mention of Judah in 14:14).

At the present time the House of Judah has full authority to represent all Hebrews in its naming of the Holy Land as Israel rather than Judea. Jacob himself prophesied that “Judah, your brothers shall praise you. Your hand shall be on the necks of your enemies. … The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor the staff from between his feet, until Shiloh comes and the allegiance of the nations is his.” That “scepter” prophecy of a Judean monarchy was begun with King David and continued despite the division of his kingdom under Rehoboam and Jeroboam. Indeed (right or wrong) the assertion of “British Israelism” that England’s monarchs were a modern continuation of that Judean monarchy was a centerpiece of that world-shaping doctrine.

The fact that the Northern Kingdom “House of Israel” was divorced by God (Hosea 1-3, Jeremiah 3:8) following Ahab and Jezebel’s sins, vested all remaining Hebrew authority in Judah … “until Shiloh comes and the allegiance of the nations is his.” Shiloh was for four centuries the House of Israel’s capital in the Holy Land, which house has been defined by Christianity since Jesus died on the cross to free it to remarry – making every believer in Him a “Bride of Christ” pending the “Wedding Feast of the Lamb.” Shiloh IS Christ in the Jacoban prophecy, bringing us full circle back to modern Israel where the “time of Jacob’s trouble” grows daily closer.

When as a Christian law student in the mid-1990s I collaborated with the late Rabbi Samuel Dresner on a book project, he taught me to recognize many of the stories of the Old Testament (especially in Genesis) as cautionary tales: what humanity ought not to do and why. These mostly involved sexuality and family relationships; for example, polygamy (Genesis 4:19-24), homosexuality (Genesis 19:4-11) and incest (Genesis 19: 30-38).

The consequences to civilization of these sins were severe and lasting. The self-pride associated with Lamech’s polygamy led both to murder and the tradition of exacting revenge on others beyond proportion to what one suffered. (The Mosaic law of “eye for and eye” is actually an attempt to correct that error.) The social acceptance of homosexual depravity caused it to spread like a virus (Psalm 12:8) and became the key harbinger of God’s wrath from Genesis to Revelation. Lot’s incest with his daughters spawned the rival “Mamzer” nations of Amon and Moab – strictly banned from interbreeding with Israelites (Deuteronomy 23:3) as border nations continually hostile to the Israelites through Bible history.

One example we didn’t discuss is modernly called “swinging,” which is letting a stranger or strangers into the marriage bed by permission of the spouse. The first case of that in the Bible was initiated by (pre-covenant) Abram’s wife, Sarai, who thought the shame of her barrenness could be overcome by having her husband mate with her handmaid, Hagar. The near-term consequence of that was Hagar’s sudden and growing contempt for Sarai upon awareness of her pregnancy, which produced her son Ishmael – technically Abram’s firstborn. The long-term consequence was a root of lasting racial bitterness which vengeful Sarai caused when she “treated [pregnant] Hagar so harshly that she fled from her” into the wilderness per Genesis 16:6. (Abram himself had abdicated his responsibilities to both women and the baby by giving his wife free reign to do it.)

But God intervened there, when “the angel of the LORD told [Hagar], ‘Return to your mistress and submit to her authority.’ Then the angel added, ‘I will greatly multiply your offspring so that they will be too numerous to count.’ The angel of the LORD proceeded: ‘Behold, you have conceived and will bear a son. And you shall name him Ishmael, for the LORD has heard your cry of affliction. He will be a wild donkey of a man, and his hand will be against everyone, and everyone’s hand against him; he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.’ So Hagar gave this name to the LORD who had spoken to her: ‘You are the God who sees me,’ for she said, ‘Here I have seen the One who sees me!'”

The trouble that Abraham and Sarah invited into their pre-covenant home became a permanent part of it, but also was revealed to be a part of God’s plan for their eventual redemption after millennia of social and political complexities and drama.

Ishmael is racially and theologically the tap-root of Islam – the original “victim” of an ancient “oppression,” grounded in the ostensibly plausible claim of a stolen birthright. The world religion that eventually emerged from this grievance is thus centered on hatred of “Jews,” and in practice fulfills the Angel’s prophecy of a nation of innumerable “wild donkeys” in perpetual conflict with and hostility toward everyone outside of itself. History shows that description is perfectly represented in Islam – a religion of war and conquest for whom “peace” means total submission to itself. But which, to be fair, largely respects the God of the Bible to the extent they understand Him. Granted, their perspective is very confused and convoluted and mixed with ancient paganism involving a moon god – Judges 8:21 – but in some other ways cleaves more closely to biblical morality and social policy than do leftist and “moderate” versions of Christianity and Judaism.

The sin of polygamy was repeated by Jacob, causing the inheritance of Abraham’s covenanted promises to be divided between the separate houses of Leah and Rachel – a topic I write on frequently because of its forgotten centrality to Bible history and prophecy. That spawned the sibling rivalry of Judah and Joseph, which was spotlighted at their first crossroads with protean Islam in Genesis 37: Judah orchestrating the sale of Joseph to the Egypt-bound Ishmaelites – who were already slave-traders then, a custom and practice that persists today.

That was only the fourth generation of the civilization-restart God established through Abraham’s bloodline to reshape the post-flood world (which Sodom proved wasn’t going so well) and just the 14th generation from the flood itself. Racial genetics was a big factor then for God’s own reasons that don’t apply in the Christian era. People reaped blessings and curses based upon their ethnic relationships – individually and collectively. It was the sad reality of the world that innocent children paid the price for the conduct of their forebears (historically being slaughtered or enslaved by conquering armies) – until Christ came with a new standard of individual merit-based reward (prophesied in Jeremiah 31:29-30), which has since become one of the implicit first principles of “universal” human rights.

Although their diversified cultures have assimilated many Christian views and values over the past 2,000 years in whole or in part, self-identified Jews and Muslims by definition reject Christ as Savior and thus retain ancient ethnicity-based vows and animosities, which, biblically speaking, are still fully binding upon them – and are on full display today in the Middle East.

God told Abraham that “through your seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed” – and that fulfilled promise is manifestly true in that salvation in Christ is held today by individuals across the entire genetic spectrum of humanity. But the tribes/nations/races and sub-races themselves also still exist and still hold their own group identities – including very emphatically the Judeans (Jews), and the numerous now-Muslim nations of Bible history that still hate them, represented in genetic amalgam as Hamas “Palestinians.”

One other key group deserves mention here also, and that is the Edomites – descendants of Esau who was the victim of another sin involving family relations when his mother, Rebecca, dishonestly orchestrated the passing of Isaac’s estate to her favored son Jacob through trickery (Genesis 27). The enmity that arose then between fraternal twins Esau and Jacob and their descendants persists to this day – having arguably peaked in the lifetime of Herod the Great who slaughtered (with Roman backing) the entire Hebrew Hasmonean Dynasty to take the Judean throne for himself. (The Herods were among many Edomomite families forcibly converted to Judaism about a century before.) [I believe it was primarily the prevalence of Herodians (politically aligned with the Sadducees) among the Jews and Israelites in Jesus’ time that explains His use of parables to hide the true meaning of His messages from non-Hebrews (Luke 8:10).]

Most in Christendom who battle over “Zionism” wrongly think the fight is about the “goodness” or “evil” of the modern House of Judah relative to its possession of the Holy Land. The real fight is between Modern “Israel” and the ancient nations with alternate claims to the land whose dispute can only be resolved on the Field of Armageddon. And the reality is that the Jews are and have always been such a stiff-necked and rebellious people that only their loss of that war in the coming “time of Jacob’s trouble” – far beyond anything they’ve yet suffered on this earth – will be sufficient to finally break them to the will of the Messiah God at the heart of their religion and all their prophecies.

In the very end, they win it all – through collective surrender to Christ – after losing every earthly possession they ever gained and held through duplicity (Zechariah 14). And with that surrender comes the final reconciliation of the two houses that was first broken in Judah’s sale of Joseph to the Ishmaelites. That’s the message of Romans 11, backed by Jeremiah 31:12-13 – and by Hosea 1-3, Ezekeiel 37 and Matthew 24:3-26:1 – if you read them with two-house awareness.

This is the first in a series of articles explaining why the battle over “Zionism” that underlies all the wars of modern Israel is unfixable by anyone but Jesus Christ.

When in 1897 a group of Jewish would-be nationalists in Great Britain formally launched a political movement under the banner of Zionism, they usurped for themselves a vision for reclaiming the Holy Land that had previously involved a partnership of both Jews and Christians.

Indeed, that vision and process was centuries old, going back at least to the 1500s in Holland and the British Isles, embodied in the commonly held doctrine of “Millennialism” (the future thousand-year bodily reign of Messiah from Jerusalem) which took the form of world-shaping ideology in the historical and theological doctrine of British Israelism (BI). For the purposes of this article, the validity of the BI doctrine is totally irrelevant. What is most essential to recognize is that highly influential Jews and Christians believed it to be true and/or used it as a controlling narrative to steer British national and international policy by.

BI virtually disappeared from Christendom upon the completion of the Zionist plan to take physical possession of the Holy Land by military force in 1917, when (on their behalf) the armed forces of the British Empire wrested control of Jerusalem and much of the original territory of the Kingdom of David from the Ottoman Turks and legally established the Jewish right to resettle it with the Balfour Declaration. Instead of the long-anticipated joint venture of two houses – Christians and Jews – united in the Holy Land under the banner of Millennialism, the modern State of Israel was born as the exclusive possession of the House of Judah. The war in Christendom about whether to oppose or support one-house Jewish nationalism was engaged: Christian Zionism vs Anti-Zionism.

For the past decade, my primary focus of research has been the history of Christian and Jewish cooperation around the theme of Millennialism during the Age of the Gentiles. I view the present battle of Zionism from far above the battlefield as a blip on a very long timeline that begins with the Abrahamic Covenant in which the land rights were first granted, and tracks the parallel paths of the two houses (Leah’s and Rachel’s) between which those covenantal rights were divided when Jacob married two wives. That timeline ends somewhere in the near future with the second advent of Christ when He will finally end the family squabble by taking personal control of the land and re-establishing the “Throne of David,” which is symbolic of the complete unity of the two houses (two-house harmony in David’s kingdom being the only time it existed in all of Hebrew history – which is the primary reason David is a “type” of Christ.)

The truth of the conflict over the Holy Land and its resolution is found only in the Bible – in the history and prophecies of the two houses: Judah (Leah) and Joseph (Rachel), which represent two distinct but interrelated cohorts in perpetual conflict. That conflict began with Judah’s sale of Joseph (Israel) into slavery to the Gentiles in Genesis 37:26-27, continued through Joseph’s salvation at the cross of Calvary (creating Christianity) and will only end with Judah’s (the “Jews”) final redemption by Christ at the close of the Gentile Age (Romans 11:25, Zechariah 12:10). Again for emphasis – the sole exception to the rule of conflict between the two houses was the reign of David, which is why his “throne” is the model (Isaiah 9:7, Luke 1:32) for the harmony that will eventually exist in the Millennial Kingdom for the reunited family of the Abrahamic covenant (Ezekiel 37:15-31).

God bequeathed the Holy Land to Abraham in a series of expanding promises: First Shechem (Genesis 12:7), then “all the land you see” (Gen 13:15), then broad specific boundaries (Gen 15:18) and finally “all of Canaan – as an eternal possession” (Gen 17:8). But the right to physical possession was delayed until after a prophesied four hundred years of slavery in Egypt was completed (Gen 15:13), pending the full ripening of the wickedness of the Canaanites that justified God’s sentence of extermination (Gen 15:16, Leviticus 18:24-28).

Hebrew slavery began when Judah convinced his brothers to sell Joseph to Egypt-bound Ishmaelites (the ethnic and theological progenitors of Islam) in Genesis 37:26-27. Joseph soon rose to power second only to Pharaoh, wearing his ring and robe (a fact highly symbolic of the House of Israel in Jesus’ parable of the restoration of the Prodigal Son). His father and all his brothers ended up there too, under his domination in fulfilment of Joseph’s prophetic dreams (Gens 37:3-11).

As the firstborn of Rachel (Rueben, firstborn of the first wife Leah having been disqualified by sleeping with his father’s concubine – 1 Chronicles 5:1), Joseph took his father’s covenantal name – Israel – as part of his inheritance, and received a double portion of the land inheritance in that both his sons held one-twelfth of the Holy Land as tribes alongside their uncles. When it came Jacob’s time to bless the two boys, he broke tradition and chose the younger grandson to inherit his name and first-born rights (Gen 48:8-20). Thus the millennial prophecy of Jeremiah 31:9 states “For I [God] am Israel’s Father, and Ephraim is my firstborn.”

So, first under Joseph and then Ephraim, the House of Israel held leadership power over the 12-tribe Hebrew nation beginning in Egypt until the end of the period of the Judges, with one important interruption. When Joseph’s legacy no longer gave the Hebrews favor under the Egyptian monarchs, God raised up the Levitical priesthood under Moses as an alternative leadership structure that operated alongside the two houses from that time forward and served as the Hebrews’ bridge out of Egypt back to the Holy Land.

Importantly, when God told the tribes to immediately enter the Holy Land from the south, it was only Joshua the Ephraimite and Caleb the Judean of the twelve spies sent to scout the path into Canaan who voted to obey God. The rest rebelled and brought severe judgment on everyone (Numbers 14:36-36). The anniversary of that rebellion is the highly significant 9th of Av (the next being Tuesday, August 13, 2024 on the Gregorian calendar).

When Moses died, the primary leadership mantle fell back upon the House of Israel, led by Joshua, through whom God established the Israelite Republic/Commonwealth featuring a significant degree of tribal and individual self-government under the rule of law (the Mosaic code). Israel’s capital was at Shiloh, where the Tabernacle of God and its holy treasures resided, including the Ark of the Covenant, through the entire period chronicled in Joshua, Judges and the first part of 1 Samuel.

When the House of Israel failed in its leadership duty – allowing the Ark of the Covenant to be stolen by the Philistines – God transferred ruling power to the House of Judah, where it lasted only until David’s son Solomon’s sins caused the division of the two houses to dramatically widen into two opposing kingdoms – which remains the case to this day, visible in the theological conflict of Christians (House of Israel) and Jews (House of Judah), and in the political battle of Christian Zionists vs Anti-Zionists.

As a baby Christian in the relatively innocent mid-1980s, reading the Bible for the first time, I concluded that the end-times references to “beheaded” Christians must be metaphorical because such practices did not occur in the present age. Lol. Then the third wave of global Islamist expansionism exploded and heads began rolling again all over the world. It was a faith-builder for me as I realized I should always trust the God of the Bible, because He knows “the end from the beginning” whereas we humans see only the present – and only incompletely – as we bob along on the river of time.

I’m not sure the lesson quite applies to the end-time references to the “Whore of Babylon,” but if it does, we might just be witnessing her grand entrance on the world stage in the form of Kamala Harris – “sex-worker” to the elites – whose payment wasn’t money (so far as we know) but political advancement. It’s pretty much common knowledge that Kamala “sex-worked” her way up the political ladder from total obscurity to where she currently has a reasonable chance of becoming the most powerful political figure in the world. Indeed, the fact that this IS common knowledge and apparently ISN’T a disqualifier in the minds of so many voters (and leaders) says more about the state of degeneracy in the U.S. and the world than just about anything else we’ve previously seen – that depraved moral standard being the primary identifying factor of the biblical “Whore” in question. (See Revelation 17 for color context.)

Frankly, it’s a bit shocking to watch the dramatic implosion of radical feminism that Kamala’s ascendency as the world’s top woman represents. All of the relentless and passionate work women across the globe have done for decades to promote women as equal in all ways to men based upon merit is going up in flames before their eyes. And this is in the midst of a cultural counter-revolution by a (feminist-created) army of uber-misogynist men (aka male to female “transexuals”) who have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that real women – even the butchest lesbians – actually can’t compete with real men pretending to be women whenever physical strength or skill is at issue. Even more humiliatingly, they sometimes can’t even beat these fake women in beauty contests!

Once again the Bible, which teaches from cover to cover that women are “the weaker sex” needing the care and protection of men to survive and thrive, is proven true by actual events after being derided for decades as baseless propaganda invented by men. And yet the feminists are so thoroughly trapped in their own Cultural Marxist delusions, most can’t face reality and thus are siding with the fake men! Except for the Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) who are as despised and canceled as the ex-gays by the LGBTs and for the same reason [pause to adopt Hitlerian accent]: The Narrative Uber Alles!

Now that I’ve opened the can of worms labeled “the weaker sex” (1 Peter 3:7), I need to quickly put on the whole armor of God to survive the fiery darts of outrage from mobs of both women and men in our emasculated Feminazi society. The worst, of course, are the feminized men – including especially Christian ones – who have totally surrendered to the humanist ideology but can’t escape their God-installed instinct to protect their womenfolk from external threats. The comical cognitive dissonance that results is men falling all over themselves to spare women any emotional discomfort from being deemed “weaker” by God or society. Just Google “weaker sex in the Bible” and you’ll get pages upon pages of examples of this.

What the Bible actually teaches is that women are equal in value – and in many ways superior in value such as in their child-bearing role (thus the need for men to guard and preserve them) – but are different in purpose and function, designed to follow and not lead men – especially in familial contexts. There are clear exceptions to the rule as any feminized pastor will rush to cite (Deborah, etcetera), but the exceptions merely prove the rule. As Deborah herself said to Barak in Judges 4:9 when he asked her to lead a battle instead of himself: “I will certainly go with you,” Deborah replied, “but the road you are taking will bring you no honor, because the LORD will be selling Sisera into the hand of a woman.” That’s how radically out-of-order Barak’s request was – and why it stands virtually alone in all of Bible history.

No, the Bible teaches clearly from cover to cover that men are the dominant sex by design to “provide and protect,” and women are the sheltered and protected sex designed to “help and respect” (Genesis 2:20-22; Ephesians 5:33). To reject that fact is to reject the authority of the Bible itself and the wisdom of millennia of actual practice across the spectrum of successful civilizations. Even to this day after more than a century of relentless social engineering by Marxist atheists in America, when a man and woman stand at the typical marriage altar, the officiant still asks, “Who gives this woman to be married to this man?” – an admission that she always remains under the protective covering of a man – first her father or his surrogate, who then transfers the duty of care to the man who will be her “husband” (a title rich with meaning). And those whose husbands predecease them are the most pitiable of all creatures – leading James, the brother of Jesus and first bishop of Jerusalem to declare “Pure and undefiled religion before our God and Father is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress” (James 1:27).

Heads are undoubtedly exploding now over my cultural “heresy” – which I in turn compare to the image of the the rolling heads I opened this article with: the point being that in both cases social conventions and human viewpoints do not reflect the reality of nature, history, prophecy or propriety from God’s perspective at the end of time waiting for us to catch up.

The guidance for male-female marriage relations is found in Ephesians 5:21-33 in which men have a duty to cherish their wives, and women have a duty to respect their husbands. Both are subject to a natural order in which Christ is head of the man, and man the head of the wife: not like master and slave or employer and employee, but (ironically) as my wife and I describe it when we do marriage counseling – more like President and Vice President. Which brings me back to the nightmare scenario that is VP Kamala Harris’ presumptive Democratic presidential candidacy.

Biblically speaking, even good and honorable women should not hold top executive positions absent temporary special circumstances – not because they’re not capable or competent, but because it violates God’s natural order. In this we can see why feminism and homosexuality are so closely related in the Marxist agenda and practice: They both defy the natural order perpetually as a matter of policy – with cascading negative consequences that increasingly compound over time the longer they persist. What America has become since the late 1940s (when both social poisons emerged) is living proof.

Occasional, well justified exceptions to the rule are minimally disruptive, but habitual defiance of God’s guidance is cumulative and eventually fatal to any society. Our nation’s “Kamala Harris” moment was culturally and spiritually inevitable. Let’s hope and pray it’s enough of a wake-up call to shock the nation all the way back to pre-“sexual revolution” sanity in gender matters and isn’t limited to being seen as just another good reason to vote Trump. Whether or not we follow Gods guidance as a nation is bigger than any election – even this one.

Some of the assassination survival rhetoric from the right about President Trump is disturbingly messianic in tone. We witnessed similar talk from the Israelis during his first term of office, which is more understandable from the Jewish perspective of God-ordained deliverers – their history being filled with fully human and humanly flawed “saviors” from Moses through Judges to the return from Babylon by the intervention of the Persian King Cyrus. Indeed, Trump was equated with Cyrus on a special commemorative coin.

From the Christian perspective, however, the true messiah is Jesus Christ, not a flawed human but perfect God in human form, and it is only the Antichrists – such as Antiochus IV Epiphanes in the time of the Maccabees (Daniel 11) and the still future end-times Antichrist of Revelation who claim the messianic mantle for their imperfect, demonic selves. Indeed, in Christian eschatology the entire world (except for “the elect”) will be fooled into thinking the next/final Antichrist IS the Christ – the chief Christ imposter of the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24:3-26:1, Mark 13, Luke 21:7-36) and the White Horse prophecy of Revelation 6 (all of Revelation being Christ’s expanded version of the Olivet prophecy as explained to John at the close of the Apostlic Age.) All prophecy being properly understood from the viewpoint of the Holy Land, the Israelis will be among but by no means even a majority of those bedazzled masses.

One of my oft-repeated themes in my columns is that I think Donald Trump is a modern equivalent to the Judges of Israel during the pre-monarchic Israelite Republic under the administration of the House of Israel. These were political/military “deliverers,” but none of them “the messiah.” When, after 400 years, God wrenched power away from backslidden Israel and its capital Shiloh and transferred it to the House of Judah in Jerusalem, the first true Judean King (conforming to the prophecy of Jacob in Genesis 48:10) was David, a Christ figure, but also not the Christ. However, a chorus of prophets state that the true messiah will sit “on the throne of David” in the Millennial Kingdom (e.g. 2 Samuel 7:10-13, Ezekiel 37:24-25, Luke 1:32-33.)

That still future event is the second coming of Jesus Christ, but it is preceded by the seven year reign of the Antichrist (whose identity as Antichrist is hidden for the first 3 ½ years).

Preceding David in Bible history as the first transitional monarch of the new order was King Saul – a Benjamite, not an ethnic Judean; an initially competent King who descended into mental illness under the dominion of a familiar spirit whose chief mission was to destroy David. The similarity to the Biden/Trump relationship is remarkable. (Even more so if one contemplates Barack Obama in the role of the familiar spirit). Additionally, the assassination attempt on President Trump’s life has its parallel in 1 Samuel 10:6-11.

“And it came to pass as they came, when David was returned from the slaughter of the Philistine [Goliath], that the women came out of all cities of Israel, singing and dancing, to meet King Saul, with tabrets, with joy, and with instruments of music. And the women answered one another as they played, and said, Saul hath slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands. And Saul was very wroth, and the saying displeased him; and he said, They have ascribed unto David ten thousands, and to me they have ascribed but thousands: and what can he have more but the kingdom? And Saul eyed David from that day and forward. And it came to pass on the morrow, that the evil spirit from God came upon Saul, and he prophesied in the midst of the house: and David played with his hand, as at other times: and there was a javelin in Saul’s hand. And Saul cast the javelin; for he said, I will smite David even to the wall with it. And David avoided out of his presence twice.”

Trump’s “Goliath” is the deep-state lawfare campaign exemplified by special prosecutor Jack Smith whom Trump conquered immediately prior to the Butler PA rally, clearing his path to the presidency as the post-debate Biden-demeaning media (the minstrel women) began finally admitting Trump was the far stronger candidate. The javelin was the would-be assassin’s bullet, which barely nicked him. It’s not a perfect analogy, but the key elements clearly align.

Notably, David escaped Saul’s javelin twice, the second time recorded in 1 Samuel 19, so it’s possible we’ll see another failed attempt on Trump in the weeks or months ahead, if my analogy holds tightly. Further, the biblical narrative sees Saul dead before David attains the throne, which may be fulfilled in my highly speculative observation/prediction that the elites’ best-case scenario for keeping Trump out of the presidency is for Biden to die in time to be replaced by Michelle Obama as Barack’s new and improved Avatar. As I said, this add-on is highly speculative, but plausible – and not fatal to the core comparison if wrong.

What does this all mean if Trump’s second term fulfills the role of David in the biblical model? From the Jewish perspective he could very well be perceived as the Messiah whom they eagerly await in Israel with virtually all pre-conditions having been met to receive him – including the elusive “red heifer.”

I can easily see Trump endorsing the building of the third temple just as he bucked world opinion in moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem (earning the Cyrus comparison). And I can easily see that coming as a part of a global peace deal to end WWIII, which start seems ever more likely as the elites’ last geopolitical move to try to keep Trump out of the White House. NATO/Ukraine provocations aimed at triggering an “intervention”-justifying Russian escalation are increasing dramatically. See this link, for example, which source admittedly has a pro-Russian bias but is usually careful and well-reasoned in his analysis and documentation. Importantly, this is also the official MAGA viewpoint.

Christian perspectives are divided about the end times, so in the amillennial view of Roman Catholicism (in which the Millennial Kingdom of Christ is purely symbolic of the RCC itself) and the post-millennial view of much of the Protestant Reform movement (in which the millennium ended a thousand years after the ascension of Christ – putting the burden on the church to bring about its promised peace and harmony) there is no inherent conflict in seeing Trump as a human “savior” figure, so they might go along with it.

But to the futurists like myself who take the millennial prophecies in the Bible literally, the timeline of a Trump “salvation” of Israel, America and the world from the iron grip of evil globalist forces (the “principalities and powers”) seems disturbingly to coincide with the emerging pre-MK Antichrist Kingdom – a conclusion I shrink from fully adopting personally despite the “math” I’ve outlined above because its implications are just too horrible to contemplate – and because I could be wrong on any or all of it.

I’m therefore going to vote for Trump and support him vigorously – while keeping a wary eye on his actions relative to the ticking prophetic clock of judgment. But I’m also going to watch for a possible near-term usurpation of Trump by my actual candidate for Antichrist, Obama, who has yet to make his big move in the electoral drama unfolding before us.

By the mercy of God, President Donald Trump was spared the assassin’s bullet that pierced his ear, and America was (for now) spared the horror of hopeless descent into Marxist hell. At this stage of the political world war, there is no other populist hero capable of defeating the deep-state globalist Hydra currently ensconced in Washington, D.C. – the de facto capital of world “democracy.” Hope for populists and conservatives is found only in the person of Trump – apparently backed by the power of God. If Trump falls, the remnants of our constitutional republic will fall with him, and “democracy” will be our painful fate.

A bullet through the ear. I’m hoping he recognizes the symbolic significance of that and begins to listen more clearly to the One who saved him. The first reports I saw had him saying only God could have saved him from assassination. We don’t know if that came from him or his PR team. However, in his first published interview after the incident he is quoted as saying, “By luck or by God, many people are saying it’s by God, I’m still here.” What say you, President Trump? That’s the quadrillion-dollar question.

Was this equivocation mere political calculation intended to reassure atheist voters, or is (God forbid) President Trump himself truly ambiguous on the matter? Politically speaking, ambiguity has become Trump’s secret weapon to keeping his diverse network of constituencies moving in the same direction: on virtually every controversial issue he offers vaguely contradictory comments that resonate independently with separate factions. He’s much more a politician in the traditional sense this time around than he was in his prior campaigns. For example, having Melania host Log Cabin Republican events while he publicly applauds populist efforts against drag queens and groomers is classic Bush Dynasty politics, as was the recent partial de-Christianization of the Republican platform.

The Post article showed a significantly changed Donald Trump:

“The former president shared the ‘very surreal experience’ that nearly ended his life during an interview aboard his private plane en route to Milwaukee for the GOP National Convention. …

“GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina spent much of the flight talking to Trump and found his optimism ‘unbelievable.’ ‘He feels like he has a new lease on life,’ Graham said.

“There’s already some proof of that, as Trump related that his brush with death had changed his mind about the speech he will give Thursday to accept his party’s nomination for the third consecutive time. ‘I had all prepared an extremely tough speech, really good, all about the corrupt, horrible administration,’ he said, then suddenly added: ‘But I threw it away.’

“He said a new speech was in the works because ‘I want to try to unite our country.’ Folding his arms, he added ‘but I don’t know if that’s possible. People are very divided. … Some people want open borders, some don’t. Some want men to be able to play on women’s sport teams, and others don’t.'”

What? Is Donald Trump intending to compromise on his core populist issues? Is he now thinking of presenting himself as a neutral mediator and not an implacable swamp drainer? I hope not and that all this is just a temporary moment of weakness being exploited by Lindsey Graham.

Of all the deep state snakes you’d least want coiled around President Trump in the vulnerable hours after such a trauma, Graham ranks high on the list. I picture the scene on that flight being akin to a semi-hypnotized Mogli (Trump) in the coils of Kah the boa constrictor in Disney’s original animated “Jungle Book” film.

Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis is the Marxist formula for social engineering. What happens if Donald Trump stops being the antithesis of Soviet-esque evil and sees himself as the one who brings synthesis? He’s already done that with so-called “gay marriage” and floated “dreamer” balloons on immigration, but frankly, I don’t think he’ll abandon populist themes. I rather think the people he will throw under the bus to make room for more “centrists” are the Christians – since that’s the trend we’ve seen so far. He knows most will still vote for him in spite of it, so there is little political downside in the short term – but in the long term, what would be the fate of the world under a “pragmatic” fully secularized Donald Trump?

The greatest weakness of the MAGA movement has always been the clash of worldviews of its two largest factions: Christian conservatives and secular conservative populists. Organized Christian conservatism has deep roots in the Reagan Revolution of the ’80s and ’90s and its members understand America’s heritage as a Bible-influenced constitutional republic. Secular conservative populists are largely political newbees raised to see America’s vision as (small d) democratic “freedom.” Its more seasoned members arose in 2009 with the Tea Party in reaction to escalating left-wing radicalism under Obama, and the rest started coming out of the political woodwork in 2016 in response to Trump’s brilliant outreach to the “forgotten man.”

What splits MAGA is populist (and Libertarian) ignorance of the stark distinction between “freedom” and “liberty.” As I pointed out in an email to some friends on this recent Independence Day, freedom is to liberal democracy what liberty is to constitutional republicanism. Liberty emphasizes freedom from authoritarian control or oppression while implying a sense of responsibility and accountability. However, fully realized “freedom” (the absence of restraints) is really anarchy – which is the best short explanation for the behavior and philosophy of today’s Left.

Importantly, the founders termed what they gave to us “ordered liberty,” which in context was firmly rooted in natural law from a biblical perspective – as exemplified in the preamble to the Declaration of Independence.

This John Adams quote may seem over-used to some, but “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” The future of our nation and the world depends on whether Donald John Trump understands this truth in his inner man, or just sees his Christian base as a fungible, expendable constituency in a numbers-based election equation.

One thing is certain: That assassin’s bullet understandably and unavoidably changed Trump’s trajectory. It remains to be seen where the new path leads spiritually – toward greater darkness or greater light. God has tickled your ear to get your attention, President Trump! Please don’t insult Him by ascribing your survival to “luck.”

Many people are mystified (because of Islam’s supposed hostility to homosexuals) that in 2024 American homosexuals would align with the Islamic terrorists of “Palestine.” I say “supposed,” because just as in all hyper-legalistic religions, the doctrine of the Islamic faith and the conduct of its “adherents” are often starkly at odds. When one’s focus is on the letter of the law, rather than the spirit, there’s always a loophole if you parse the statutes carefully enough (e.g., Luke 11:42). If you also overlay the ancient gnostic heresy of Manichaeim on them you can (in some versions of it) get a full pass on any infraction, because 1) the flesh is evil, 2) humans can’t overcome the flesh, and thus 3) whatever you do to indulge it is not your fault. Other versions of Manichaeism insist you can and must become perfectly pure through flesh-denying spirituality. (In contrast, biblical Christianity sees purity for believers as merely aspirational with our inevitable shortcomings bridged by the mercy of Jesus Christ who paid the price for all sin.)

The most famous Roman Catholic form of Manichaism was Catharism – which flesh-indulging version under the Bulgarians of the Middle Ages became synonymous with homosexual sodomy (“buggery”) and seems still to infect a sizable portion of the priesthood. A Jewish form of Manichaeism was called Frankism, which “asserted that the most important obligation of every person was the transgression of every boundary.” The parents of Supreme Court Justice Luis Brandeis – who invented the extra-constitutional “right to privacy” by which many forms of sexual deviance have subsequently been normalized in America – were Frankists (“Heroes – Trailblazers of the Jewish People,” Beit Hatfutsot, archived from the original on Nov. 17, 2019.

The Islamic form of Manichaeism was very influential in Sufism (also involving homosexuality), which was heavily practiced in Afghanistan until the rise of the Taliban who suppressed it. After the U.S. drove the Taliban from power, homosexual deviance in the form of pederasty flooded back into the society. Under the Obama regime, occupying U.S. soldiers were strictly forbidden from interfering with the open rape and sexual abuse of boys by Afghan security forces, and in 2010 and 2011 at least two U.S. officers were punished for trying. It was only under the Trump administration that a formal investigation was conducted and reported upon by the Army Times, in a Nov. 17, 2017, article titled “DoD IG: US Troops were told to ignore child sexual abuse by Afghan forces.”

But back to Islam and Palestine, whose most famous personage was PLO leader Yasser Arafat (1929-2004). Arafat’s homosexuality was widely acknowledged since at least 1976, when the testimony of a former associate (also homosexual) was published in a Canadian biography, “Arafat, the Man and the Myth” by Thomas Kiernan. Kiernan quotes this man at length:

“We went one night on a training exercise, about twenty of us. We were camped in a citrus grove near Gaza in tents. There was an emergency of some kind. … Several of us ran to Abu Khalid’s tent to find out what we should do. There we discovered Abu Khalid and Yasir giving themselves pleasure – or should I say Yasir was giving Abu Khalid pleasure? After that, Abu Khalid was quite open about what he did with Yasir. In fact, he encouraged all of us to participate in such activities. He said it should be a part of the guerrilla way of life. … It created a closer bond among us. Most of us sooner or later were doing it as a regular way of life. Some of us even gave pleasure to Abu Khalid, and him to us. But he would never let us touch Yasir. Yasir was his special province (Kiernan:108).”

According to Dr. Asher Eder, Jewish co-chairman of the Islam-Israel Fellowship organization, the name “Yasser Arafat” was an alias. Arafat changed his real name, Abdul Rauf el-Codbi el-Husseini, to hide his relationship to Mufti Haj Amin Husseini, his uncle (Eder, “How to Disarm the Terrible Jihad Psychosis Against Jews and Israel that Afflicts the Muslim World Today,” www.rb.org, Feb. 24, 2000).

Mufti Haj Amin Husseini became a close ally of Adolf Hitler. According to Icelandic historian, S. G. Bergsson, in Muftism and Nazism, Husseini became mufti (supreme religious leader) of Jerusalem in 1921 and celebrated by organizing a Jewish pogrom that year. One of the leaders of the massacre of Jews in the 1920 Arab riots in Palestine, Husseini first made contact with the Nazi regime in 1933 and by 1936 was carrying out anti-Jewish riots “with funds supplied by the Nazis” (Bergsson: chapter 3, p.2f).

Further to this topic, the Sowetan newspaper of Johannesburg published this editorial on the topic by South African legislator Jack Bloom:

“Ambiguous Arab-Muslim attitudes to Hitler can be traced to his popularity in much of the Arab world both before and during the Second World War. Political parties that imitated the Nazis were founded, such as the Syrian Social Nationalist Party and Young Eqypt, replete with stormtroopers, torch processions and Nazi slogans. The most significant collaborator with Hitler was … Haj Amin el-Husseini. … His energetic pro-Nazi efforts included a Muslim SS unit in Bosnia. … General Abdul Nasser was a member of Young Egypt and made no secret of his earlier Nazi sympathies when he became president of Egypt. Former Nazis served in his army and secret police, and his personal bodyguard was SS General Oskar Dirlewanger.” (The Sowetan, October 2, 2001)

Dirlewanger, a former SA Freikorps commander in the 1920s, was the creator of an extremely barbarous SS unit known as the Sonderkommando Dirlewanger. According to “gay” historians, homosexual men in Nazi concentration camps had the choice to be released through “transfer to a delinquent battalion like the vicious ‘Strafbataillon Dirlewanger'” (IGLA Euroletter 52, August 1977). Dirlewanger was assisted by former Hitler buddies Otto Skorzeny and Eugen Dollman who recruited large numbers of former Nazi fugitives from Argentina for key posts in the new republican regime in Egypt. Dollman was well known as a homosexual; less is known about Skorzeny, although he had been Hitler’s bodyguard in 1939, and is thus likely to have been “gay.” It is well known that Adolf Hitler was a Manichaen, as was Heinrich Himmler who designed the SS as a overtly occultic organization. It is more vigorously disputed but just as true that Hitler was a homosexual.

This is only a sample of the intertwining relationship of Islam, Nazism and “Queerness” documented in “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party.” The facts in this article are drawn from Chapters 2 and 7 of the 6th Edition, currently a work-in-progress scheduled for publication in early 2025. For print copies of prior versions go here (the 4th edition is the best option), or for a free introductory video series go here.

My regular readers know that I have a slightly unusual writing style that typically features first-person observations and self-disclosures in the context of offering reasoned analysis on politics, history and theology. Since my early teens I’ve intentionally sought out diverse life experiences specifically for their storytelling value, and since my late 20s (when I was saved and healed from 16 years of alcoholism and drug addiction in prayer to Jesus Christ) all those experiences have become fuel and fodder for a lifestyle of testimonial evangelism.

My writing is my primary medium for fulfilling my mission, and thus nearly everything I write is to serve the cause of Christ by sharing truth on topics of social controversy in which my own firsthand perspectives add weight to my cautions, conclusions and predictions. The more afraid others are to tackle a topic, the more likely I am to address it: e.g., the ugly history and agenda of the LGBT movement, the hornets nest of Zionism vs. Antizionism, the balanced reality of people and places like Putin and Russia who are heavily and continuously smeared by professional propaganda agencies. This approach puts me on the “fringe” compared to other, higher-status pundits, who toe the more mainstream-conservative line, but who nevertheless read my work and occasionally adopt my talking points. Attribution would be nice, but the real satisfaction is in their de facto validation of my analysis.

Some might misperceive my style as self-aggrandizing, but it is not. I give all glory to God for any good thing in me or my writing, and I am as willing to share unflattering facts about myself and my experiences as I am to share my victories. Today I will share some very personal and unflattering facts to offer insights about the imprisonment of Steve Bannon.

I went to adult jail twice as a teenager: once at 17 and again at 19. I served a month each time in the county jail we street people called the Elm Street College in Greenfield, Massachusetts. I had been a homeless alcoholic since the age of 16 after my father’s final mental breakdown destroyed our family of eight: he staged an armed standoff with the state police in our home over my having dropped out of school – with shots and tear-gas canisters fired to the shock of my small town neighbors who gathered to watch. He was taken away that afternoon to the state mental hospital under whose care he spent the rest of his life – eventually as an out-patient. My mom lost the house after that and had to move to a smaller one where there was literally no place for me. So I was on the streets getting by as a petty criminal while I finished getting my diploma from a start-up far-left hippie “free school,” graduating in 1976, class of one, the first student to do so.

That petty-criminal lifestyle was how I ended up in jail the first time. I don’t remember the charge, but I do remember being the youngest guy in the jail, and my misfortune that an inmate’s watch had been stolen from his cell the day I arrived. Inmate justice ensued, and every person was required to walk to that cell and then another “drop-off” spot – solo – until the whole group had done so. Thus the property could be recovered with no one punished for taking it. Meanwhile the population of the tier sat together as a group at picnic tables in the common area, while the boss inmate of the tier walked back and forth haranguing the group about the evils of stealing. I would have been amused by the irony except that each time he walked past me he slapped me hard on the side of the head – indicating to everyone he thought I was the thief. I was terrified.

I had arrived shortly after a huge scandal. The Boston mob had long used this jail as their private country club and had even take over the conjugal visit room as an office. The guards were in their pocket. But two goons ruined the fun when they used their trip away for a court appearance as an opportunity to rob an armored car (but got caught). The authorities soon descended en masse on the jail and swept it clean of organized crime figures – except for one lower-level guy named Charlie who somehow escaped the net. Charlie witnessed my ordeal over the watch and took me under his wing, making me untouchable by the punks in power. The only problem was Charlie was a homosexual. Now I was very liberal in those days and that fact didn’t bother me – and no, I wasn’t raped in jail; although the truly crazy guy Charlie assigned as my body guard, Tex (sporting a “Born to Lose” tattoo on his forearm), did make one unsuccessful try.

For his part, Charlie, who owned a string of strip-clubs, tried only to recruit me into filming porn, asking me to read a script for a (hetero) porn flick and offering me a bartending job in one of his clubs. I thanked him for his protection and told him I’d think about it but in the end declined. That’s all I have space to share.

This week Dr. Naomi Wolf wrote a stirring piece on the political implications of Steve Bannon’s ordeal that also addressed the “man vs. institution” fight he will face behind bars. She titled it “What time it is: The imprisonment of Stephen K Bannon.” It is well worthy of your attention.

It caught my eye because in it she invoked the torture camps of the Nazi SA in the months following their arson of the German Reichstag – which was a theme of my recent WND column “J6 and the burning of the German Reichstag” – to my knowledge the first to cite this aspect of the famous historical event in the conservative blogosphere in years, if ever. She either read my piece or received concurrent Holy Spirit inspiration on this topic (a phenomenon I have experienced multiple times in the past with others). Either way, I was impressed.

Now “minimum security” Danbury federal prison isn’t all that far geographically from the Elm Street college (Massachusetts and Connecticut are bordering states) and probably isn’t all that different a culture for inmates in the aspects that matter most: loss of freedom, privacy, dignity and personal security.

Wolf highlighted the institutional restrictions and Bannon’s loss of connection with the outside world, but I would like to address what she cannot: the sudden and shocking immersion of an intelligent, sensitive and idealistic human being into a society dominated by predatory animals. As an inmate in any prison, even county jail, being in “gen-pop” is entirely different and separate from your relationship with the institution itself – and unlike anything you’ve experienced in the outside world.

For all his bluster and bravado in the days and weeks preceding his incarceration, as of right now Steve Bannon is just a lone man in a dangerous jungle. It’s possible he will be received as a hero by some and have an instant support network to shield him from the others, but it is equally possible he will shunned and seen as a “prized trophy” by malicious haters. In my observation most criminals, as lifetime consumers of corporate media narratives and recipients of government largess, tend to lean to the left in political matters. And it’s a hard fact that the prison guards and administrators are all members of public employee unions, even if some may be conservatives even in liberal Connecticut.

In Matthew 5:10 Jesus said, “Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” I suffered for my own crimes and stupidity while Bannon (along with most of the J6ers) is truly suffering for righteousness’ sake, but the key commonality is that he IS suffering because prison is a place designed for suffering.

What Steve Bannon needs most from us is prayer! Only God can protect him where he is.

Unlike the many pundits who have concluded – in retrospect – that Biden’s debate debacle was an orchestrated coup by the Dem elites, my prediction of that coup and supporting analysis was published on WND two days before the debate, under the title “Why June 27 will be another ‘Night of the Long Knives.'” I said right up front: “I believe the primary purpose of the debate is to shock the Kool-Aid-drinking blue-pilled left into reality as to Biden’s dementia and the need to remove him. The pro-Biden propaganda machine will keep pumping out the ‘Joe is OK and can win’ narrative right up to the debate itself, and then afterward all the key choir leaders (Rachel ‘Mad Dog’ Maddow, Anderson ‘Catamitus’ Cooper, et al.) will pull out their new song-sheet and talking points.”

That is exactly what happened. The rank and file Dem voters and donors had an instant panic attack during the debate, and within 24 hours Big Media, led by the editorial board of the New York Times, no less, began demanding Biden’s resignation (although Maddow herself didn’t join them). Predictably, the Biden family and core loyalists pushed back hard against that demand and threw up a temporarily defensible barricade around the putative president’s inner circle. And, predictably, the presumed chief coup orchestrator – Barack Obama (along with Pelosi and the Clintons) – rushed to publicly back Old Joe (pending his inevitable surrender). They need the Dem base to blame other people for whatever goes wrong in the coming transfer of power, and for themselves to be perceived as saviors of the process – reluctantly coming around later to the sad necessity of agreeing that Joe needs a “dignified exit” for the sake of “Democracy.”

All of this, including the “comeback kid” theme now being pantomimed before the public is all for show while the extreme and fluid complexities of the power transfer are worked through behind the scenes.

As long as other options exist, however, the Dem elites do NOT want Joe to be reelected! Why? Because, as everyone who’s ever witnessed the phenomenon up close knows, dementia is both irreversible and progressive at an ever increasing speed, and thus in the event of a Biden victory in November there would be no way to prevent the almost universally despised Kamala Harris from becoming president – with no way to remove her. There is no way Biden can finish a second term at the rate he’s declining.

But, of course, because she’s a black female, no one involved in the Biden removal process can ever publicly admit this. Of course, even Harris would be better than Trump in their warped minds – but a Joe Biden reelection is clearly the worst-case “victory” scenario.

The supposed best-case scenario being floated now is for Joe to be persuaded to resign – soon – but the people with the most control of that decision are the ones most desperate to keep him in power: the dominant members of the Biden crime family whose exposure to serious jail time is a very real possibility if they lose the protections of the presidency and its “justice” department. They will fight like cornered wolverines to stay in power – at least until they’re presented with an offer they can’t refuse or are guaranteed sanctuary in a foreign jurisdiction with no extradition treaty with the U.S.

Further, there are election law problems in some states for a candidate who resigns after the primaries. Georgia law allows for the withdrawal of a presidential nominee only if the candidate dies or is unable to serve due to illness or disability (Ga. Code Ann. § 21-2-1), and South Carolina law does not allow for the withdrawal of a presidential nominee for political reasons (S.C. Code Ann. § 7-13-130).

Here’s the kicker, though: The key swing state of Wisconsin’s law allows for the withdrawal of a presidential nominee only in the event of death (Wis. Stat. Ann. § 8.35(1)).

Therefore, from a purely cold-hearted Machiavellian perspective, the actual best-case scenario for the Dem elites is for Biden to die within the narrowing window of time for a replacement nominee to be installed. Unfortunately for old Joe, there are no more cold-hearted Machiavellians in this world today other than Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Bill and Hillary Clinton.

A Biden helicopter crash in Marine One directly on Kamala’s house, killing them both instantly would be too suspicious, but, as I’ve postulated since the early days of the Biden regime, a Biden stroke or similar medical event would appear to most people a natural event under the circumstances. In my WND column of May 20, 2024, I stated that I think the Washington Post’s May 14 gratuitous public reminder of Biden’s two prior brain aneurisms was a deliberate setup for this.

So, again, I think Joe Biden is going to suffer a real or staged stroke or similar malady very soon, and for the first time I’m suggesting it may be fatal. Either way, in this best-case or next-best-case scenario for the Dems, Joe will exit stage left and Kamala Harris will have the consolation prize of becoming the putative first woman president for a few months. She’ll be kept out of sight as much as possible so as not to damage the DNC’s actual nominee. And if, as I (along with the great prognosticator Wayne Allyn Root) believe that nominee is Michelle Obama, Harris could actually make her the VP for those key weeks leading up to the election, letting Michelle – and perhaps Barack himself as potential First Dude – use the presidential podium for maximum effect. Talk about a Dem elite wet dream!

There are a couple of other possible factors/scenarios that should also be mentioned.

The first is a Trump assassination, which is actually being urged by some of the more fringy characters on the Left. The Dem elites would certainly love Trump to die, but they know an assassination would likely mean civil war, and that would at the very least disrupt their plundering of the public treasury and could potentially lead to their own public hangings (they’re keenly aware that the other side owns most of the guns and most cops are conservatives).

The second is WWIII and/or major false flag terror attacks sufficient to suspend the elections under martial law. However, without a strong Democrat “commander in chief” at the helm (as Biden was ostensibly perceived to be until the debate), that scenario would vastly favor Trump who actually is a strong commander even in the eyes of those who hate him. And, again, civil war would be a likely result.

So, I’m sticking my neck out again with prediction options that will again be called “wild speculation” instead of “forward-looking reasoned analysis” – unless and until they actually occur, when others will take the credit for calling them retroactively [he said with a bemused smile].

I never thought I’d live to see the day when the American public finally pushed back effectively against the LGBT Brownshirt Bully-Culture, but it’s happening right now on an impressive scale – even at Disney!

First let’s review recent news on the issue. On May 31, 2024, the Washington Stand published an article titled, “Companies Scrap Over-the-Top Pride Plans to Escape June’s Backlash for Business.” It stated: “It wasn’t that long ago that the mainstream media mocked conservatives for trying to flex their consumer muscle. Not anymore. A year removed from the Bud Light fiasco that sparked a thousand boycotts, even USA Today is admitting – the grassroots strategy worked. LGBT Pride, at least as a wholesale business concept, is dead. For companies brave (or foolish) enough to test Americans’ outrage in 2024, one thing is for certain: there’s no pot of gold at the end of this June’s rainbow. To most CEOs’ surprise, the wave of national fury over trans activism hasn’t just remained steady over the past 14 months – it’s exploded in strength and scope.” [Emphasis added.]

Jump to the present to see just how true that assessment was. On June 27 Bloomberg ran an article whose title and opening line tell the whole story: “Is This the Summer That Humbled Gay Pride? Believing companies would somehow remain loyal to LGBTQ+ consumers following last year’s intense pushback was wishful thinking.” From the article: “According to The Business of Fashion – an industry news site – Nike Inc. ‘is not releasing a Pride-themed collection or targeted ad campaign” for the first time since 1999. Target hasn’t eliminated LGBTQ+ products for Pride month but not all of its estimated 2,000 stores will carry them. …

“The biggest lesson marketers took away last year is the fate of Anheuser-Busch’s Bud Light. A niche campaign featuring Dylan Mulvaney, a trans woman actor, became the object of vitriol and a boycott from conservative groups, leading to a more widespread backlash against the beer. Bud Light sales in the U.S. are down 28% from 2023, when it lost its top rank to Modelo Especial, a Mexican brew, amid the controversy. With market share and profits at risk, companies recoiled from LGBTQ+ consumers.”

You can tell from the way these far-left journalists minimize the extent of the scale-back – at Target, for example, and their spin that the corporate “recoil” is from “LGBTQ+ consumers” rather than the LGBT agenda – just how painful it is for the media to admit any diminution at all in “pride” power.

But it gets better. On June 28 the AP ran a story titled “Tractor Supply is ending DEI and climate efforts after conservative backlash online.” It reads, “Tractor Supply said it would be eliminating all of its diversity, equity and inclusion roles while retiring current DEI goals … [and] added that it would ‘stop sponsoring nonbusiness activities’ such as Pride festivals or voting campaigns – and no longer submit data to the Human Rights Campaign, the largest advocacy group for LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S.” This is a HUGE step toward a return to normalcy in the business world and a major blow to the the LGBT cultural hegemon.

The most significant evidence for me, however, was what I saw at my own eyes at Disneyland (the Anaheim campus) on Gay Pride Day itself, June 28, 2024. As it happens, my wife and I recently reconnected with a 9-year-old granddaughter we haven’t seen or spoken to in five or six years. She lives in Southern California within driving distance of Disneyland, and her greatest wish as we planned a reunion was to have a Princess Day at the park. So that’s what we did. I bought tickets for the 27th and 28th without any thought on my part about the significance of the 28th. Strange as it might seem considering my 30 years of pro-family activism, I didn’t mentally connect the fact that we’d be there on “Gay Pride Day” – so completely separate in my mind are family matters and politics.

When, the day before, I suddenly did realize the timing, I had a moment of dread that we would be engulfed in “pride” propaganda on our special day. But when we reached the park that morning of the 27th there was really nothing but a few rainbow accent banners near the entrance to placate the woke (without any other indication that it was LGBT-related), despite it being “Pride Month.” The next day – Pride Day – the most sacred day on the woke calendar – the only difference was the addition of a single flower arrangement in the shape of Mickey ears next to a 2×3 informational sign outside the park in the shopping area called Downtown Disney, off to the side of the main walkway next to the ever-present Jehovah’s Witness team and display. I was frankly astonished – and pleased – that even Disney had largely shut out the faux “pride” pushers. There was a little more wokeness on the Disneyland App, but the overall real-world experience was gloriously non-woke.

Now, some readers will be disappointed that I went to Disneyland at all, but it has always been my policy to reward the good even while punishing the bad in the entities I boycott. I have no use for the Disney Corporation generally speaking, but Disneyland remains (even on Gay Pride Day!) the most hetero-normative entertainment venue in the world. Every single day it is open, that park hosts a gigantic teeming mass of normal families in normal dad/mom/kids configurations and boy/girl romantic duos. Even on Gay Pride Day 2024, people with obvious same-sex attraction disorder were considerably more rare than, for example, people in wheelchairs (like my wife).

In contrast, Disney World in Florida is in many ways just another theme park, but Walt’s spirit seems still to reside, and thrive, at Disneyland. He’s no doubt been spinning in his grave for years now over the rise of anti-family quackery in the company he founded, but if so, his pain is likely lessened recently by the rising tsunami of public demands for a return to family-centered normalcy across America.

When I got my start in pro-family activism during the Reagan Revolution the effort to stop the LGBT agenda was a mostly Christian thing. The rest of society didn’t see or believe where we Christian activists knew it was all headed. But thankfully, when the hard left finally achieved most of what we tried to prevent, the MAGA populist movement was just hitting its stride and decided enough was enough. The addition of their voices and resources to the cause of restoring the natural family to cultural primacy has now obviously tipped the scales.

Thank God that the Rainbow Mafia appears finally to have been routed. Let’s all hope and pray that all the LGBTs retreat fully to the discrete privacy-cherishing sub-cultures we were always willing to tolerate (within reason) – and did largely tolerate in the 1940s and ’50s.

I believe Barack Obama has scheduled his faithful Avatar Joe Biden for political (not actual) “assassination,” live on CNN, on the night of the Trump/Biden “debate,” to pave the way for his own return to the White House on the coattails of his wife, through maneuvers at the upcoming Democratic National Convention. I believe the primary purpose of the debate is to shock the Kool-Aid-drinking blue-pilled left into reality as to Biden’s dementia and the need to remove him.

The pro-Biden propaganda machine will keep pumping out the “Joe is OK and can win” narrative right up to the debate itself, and then afterward all the key choir leaders (Rachel “Mad Dog” Maddow, Anderson “Catamitus” Cooper, et al.) will pull out their new song-sheet and talking points. I could, of course, be wrong – but it’s at least a highly plausible theory consistent with the Dem “morals” and mindset …. and with the history of Antichrist types like Obama.

On June 30, 1934, the last weekend of June, Adolf Hitler betrayed one of his closest friends and allies: the man above all others to whom he owed his success in his long rise to power from the streets of Munich in the 1910s, Ernst Roehm. That event, in which as many as 2,000 of Hitler’s enemies and potential threats were assassinated, was called “The Night of the Long Knives,” which has ever since been a metaphor for betrayal of the most consequential sort. Hitler would never have taken power in Germany if not for the Sturmabteilung (SA) “Storm Troopers,” which Ernst Roehm had first shaped into the most formidable and feared street-fighting force in Europe in the 1920s – and then grew to an army over 3 million strong whose street muscle and grassroots electioneering won Hitler the German chancellorship in 1932. They were called the Brownshirts because, unlike the many gray-uniformed Freicorps bands of out-of-work soldiers from WWI, their founder, Gerhard Rossbach, clothed his men in brown uniforms left over from Germany’s defeated African colonies.

That was not the only thing that made the Rossbachbund unique: Its members were openly, indeed notoriously, homosexual. Roehm was recruited into the Rossbachbund – and into homosexuality – by Rossbach himself, taking it over and renaming it the SA. Eventually, Roehm’s power rivaled that of even national war-hero Herman Goering, and his SA HQ in Munich, the “Brown House,” began establishing its own concentration camps in open defiance of Goering. Dachau, outside Munich, was Roehm’s first: the model and testing ground for grossly sexually-sadistic practices (including testicle-crushing with a machine specifically designed for the Gestapo) that would spread throughout all of German occupied territory.

The initial system of concentration camps had been organized by Goering upon relatively more humanitarian lines, like those of the British during the Boer War in Africa. As Leonard Mosley records in “The Reich Marshal: A Biography of Hermann Goering”:

“[A]larming rumors [began] to circulate that the SA had begun setting up camps of it own, in addition to those which Goering had authorized, and that in these secret places acts of great brutality were being committed against the occupants. … [These illegal camps] annoyed him, because they constituted a threat to his authority. … He blamed [Berlin SA leader and Roehm subbordinate] Karl Ernst for these, because the most notorious ones, in addition to Ernst’s own, were run by two of his closest homosexual friends, Gauleiter Karpfenstein of Pomerania, who had a camp near Stettin, and Obergruppenfuehrer Heines, who conducted a particularly sadistic regime in a camp outside Breslau” (Mosley, 1974, 204-204).

That power play by Roehm would make Goering his lasting archenemy in a behind-the-scenes political war Goering would finally win on the night in question. Karl Ernst (whom even lefty Wikipedia admits “had been … a bouncer at gay nightclubs” prior to joining the Nazi Party) was also assassinated in the Roehm Purge.

So how is any of this relevant to the events of this week in America? First is the fact that America would not be in the social and political mess it’s in were it not for it’s own homosexual “Brownshirts” who made their first major move to take over this nation on the very same weekend in 1969 – specifically, June 28, 1969 – when the “gay” movement officially abandoned its prior demand for “tolerance” and launched a war for total cultural conquest in the Stonewall Riots in NYC. The anniversary of that extreme violence against the police has ever since been celebrated as “Gay Pride Day.”

After Stonewall and a short period of getting nationally organized, squads of “gay” bullies – in a style now commonplace among the anti-Semitic left on college campuses – first (successfully) targeted and compelled the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to end the recognition of same-sex attraction disorder as a pathology in 1973. (The APA has ever since been a vassal and tool of the hard left.) Freed from that political straightjacket, the LGBTs then proceeded to systematically coerce and intimidate every other institution and entity in the nation (especially media and academia) to full compliance with LGBT cultural hegemony, including finally the Boy Scouts of America and the U.S. military. The truth of this is indisputable.

Now lets look at the players on the present stage. It’s not a perfect analogy but fits the pattern in several essential respects. The Grand Narcissist Obama is clearly in the Hitler role, both in the common grandiose vision of “fundamentally transforming” the world to suit his personal vision, and in the (barely hidden) dysfunction of homosexuality – masked by what I believe is a female beard in both cases (Eva Braun and Michelle).

Biden is in the role of Roehm – in the sense of serving Obama in whatever capacity has been necessary to preserve his master’s power. Obama would not have been in a position to effectively run his shadow government post 2016, or to pull off the 2020 coup to oust Trump from the White House without fiercely loyal Biden. But now circumstances have changed dramatically and Biden represents the most serious threat to Obama’s continuation of power – just as Roehm represented Hitler’s most serious threat once he needed to actually govern. There is no other option but removal in both cases – in a way that allows all the scandals, criminality and ethical hypocrisies of the prior years to be blamed upon and “buried” with the victim.

As I’ve stated publicly several times, I think it’s most likely Biden will be “stroked out” and removed stage-left to a nursing home. I could be wrong on any of the predictions in this article, but of the past events I’ve reported here, and the nature and inclinations of the nefarious players I’ve mentioned above I am certainly right. In future history’s timeline, I think this week will rank with 1934 and 1969 as world-changing for similar reasons.

By the grace of God I was not in D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021, or I’d probably be rotting away in the D.C. Gulag like the still-growing hundreds of MAGA political prisoners who fell into the entrapment nets set for them on that day by the Obiden secret police. I would never have committed violent acts or breached clearly marked areas, but out of curiosity I might well have been part of the group that entered the Capitol at the invitation/facilitation of the police after the do-not-enter signs and barriers had been pre-removed by presumed Obiden operatives.

As has become obvious since then, Obiden’s shadow government was already (rather, still) in power in D.C., despite four years of Trump’s partial control of the Executive Branch. Hopefully, if Trump regains the White House this November and purges the traitors from public office, all the deep state conspirators who nurtured, provoked and staged the “insurrection” will be exposed and prosecuted.

Instead of D.C., I was driving my wife on a long-promised vacation to Florida. Despite the potent lure of attending the historic event on J6, I couldn’t justify postponing that vacation because I’d just been in Washington on Dec. 12 for the multiple concurrent rallies Steve Bannon called the “Gathering of the Tribes” (an amazingly unique and frankly more impressive event than J6 in terms of the stunning diversity of distinct pro-Trump ethnic and affinity groups on display – united only by their love of Donald Trump.)

So on Jan. 5, we overnighted at the Comfort Inn near the Atlanta airport – where I experienced my own slice of election-fraud drama that I reported the next day in my newsletter:

“I happen to be in Fulton County, Georgia, this morning (Atlanta), where, of course, the Purple Uniparty (the partnership of DEMONIC DEEP-BLUE DEMS and ROTTEN RED RINOs) stole another election last night through fraud – which was only possible because the corrupt ‘Republican’ governor and secretary of state worked tirelessly since Nov. 3rd to protect and preserve the cheat-machine that apparently put them in office in a prior election, and that on Nov. 3rd, 2020, ensured Georgia’s ‘vote’ would flip from Trump to Biden, and force run-off elections for her two conservative Republican U.S. senators.”

What I didn’t include then, because I didn’t put it all together at the time, was that around 2 a.m. on the 6th a large group of loud and excited people gathered in the adjoining room for some sort of meeting that lasted less than an hour. I couldn’t make out many words, but (having been involved in many election campaigns, including my own two runs for governor of Massachusetts) I recognized the clear “feel” of the group as grassroots political, and realized later that it was likely a cash payoff meeting for ballot-stuffers.

I wrote my newsletter in the early morning of J6 and published it by email at exactly 9:57 a.m. Eastern – well before the now infamous events of the day. Presciently, it opened with the following questions:

“What if the German Christians and Jews of the 1920s had been able to see into the future and realize the full consequences of allowing the Marxist Adolf Hitler to take control of their nation in the stolen election of 1933, when his ‘National Socialist German Workers Party’ (aka NAZI Party) secretly burned down the German Parliament and then accused his political enemies of the crime? Do you think we will fare better than the Germans if the Dems take control of all three branches of our government on Jan. 21 because we let them get away with the most blatant and egregious election fraud in world history?”

Now compare what we’ve all witnessed in Obiden’s America since J6 to this short passage in Leonard Mosley’s “The Reich Marshall: Herman Goering” (1974):

“[I]mmediately after the Reichstag fire the National Socialists made good propaganda use of it. On the day after it had happened, while the ruins still smoldered, Adolf Hitler prevailed on President Hindenberg to sign a decree suspending the seven sections of the constitution guaranteeing individual and civil liberties. It was directed against ‘Communist acts of violence endangering the state’ and it ordained:

“Restrictions on personal liberty and on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the Press;

“Curtailment of rights of freedom and assembly and association;

“Censorship of mail, telegraphic messages, and telephone conversations;

“An abrogation of the legal limits on house arrests, requisitions, and searches.

“It was now that the auxiliary SA and SS members of the police came into their own” (Mosley:200).

Replace the word “Communist” with “MAGA” in the third sentence, update the forms of available communication being censored to include social media, and add the suspension of the constitutional right to a “speedy trial” for the J6ers, and the Obiden strategy and tactics are eerily similar to Adolf Hitler’s.

Of course, when we say Obiden we mean Obama, so when we add to this analysis the (heavily suppressed) fact that both Obama and Hitler suffered from homosexuality, and for whom women apparently served as “beards” to fool the public, the homo-fascist parallels are even more disturbing.

Now, leftist and LGBT-compromised “conservative” heads will certainly be exploding at the outing of Hitler as “gay.” This is the solidly documented true history the SPLC named me a “hate group” for exposing and whose agents have for more than 20 years relentlessly worked to cancel me to suppress. You can confirm it for yourself by reading “The Pink Swastika” 4th Edition exclusively here (because Amazon and the other big booksellers have banned it!)

As for the issue of “beards,” my research strongly suggests that Hitler was set up with Eva Braun (late in life) by his exclusive photographer and “fixer” Heinrich Hoffman who had previously married off his own daughter Henny to “gay” Hitler Youth chief Baldur von Schirach, apparently to quash public rumors about his homosexuality. Eva was Hoffman’s employee. Supposedly, Obama’s pastor Jeremiah “G-d Damn America” Wright played the Hoffman role for him in the procurement of “Michelle” (who may or may not actually be a transgender). Discussion of these contentions are contained in the not-yet-published 6th Edition of “The Pink Swastika,” scheduled for release on Jan. 1, 2025.

Speaking of the SPLC and the potential for backlash against the treasonous left, I reject the media and union boss narrow spin that SPLC’s sudden termination of about a quarter of their staff last week was solely “greed based.” If you read between the lines of their own press statement it looks also like policy changes triggered by fear of the fast-growing anti-woke movement. SPLC said it was “to focus and align our work with our programmatic priorities and goals” – which sounds a lot like woke-hurt Disney’s damage-control “apology” to its stockholders after losing its showdown with Ron DeSantis and multiple stink-pot movie releases. I think the money-grubbing SPLC greatly fears fundraising fallout – especially in regards to its anti-whiteness manipulation and LGBT grooming of schoolchildren – in which effort the SPLC has been the Josef Goebbels of public education. Reportedly, the department most affected by the “streamlining” is their “educational” arm.